First of all, I responded to Joko Forster and now Wuri Jallow are you the same person? Whoever, thanks for your response and the nature of the exchange. Besides, Human error and natural course to my understanding are two different things, As you said, if the pilot fly in the storm, to my understanding is human error as much as I will never see fire burning and put my finger inside. According to superstitious believes, only the descendants of the prophet can do that and get away with it.
I am talking about strategical business occurrences which can also be called natural in business terms because it occurred unexpectedly due to the competitive edge in winning the trust of customers from your competitors. however, I am well aware of the fact that you can use SWOT analysing tool in various ways and various system as far as it involves various players and interaction within, my question is shouldn't it be systematically used as agreed upon to avoid confusion? thanks again and have a pleasant evening.
Edi
Wuri Jallow <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Mr. Sidibeh,
thanks for your reaction. I see no contradiction in my rendition. I did
make a qualifier that you must follow the sequence of the accronym. I
believe Mr. Nyang's presentation was more a matter of style, to accentuate
the key issues to be addressed. Once we accept the accronym, we must also
respect how we apply it, hence following its sequencing. your
interpretation (or understanding)) of SWOT is very narrow. Of course, you
can apply it to entities in the making. There are basically two ways that
come to mind. One, where an existing entity has been taken over and is
being overhauled or recreated. The second is where a new entity is being
created. The broader application of SWOT relates to this situation also.
For example if we agree that SWOT is an appraisal system, it also applies
to projects which are being formulated, as they are also entities in the
making. In respect to the use of the word 'avoiding', you can indeed, avoid
a natural cause. For instance, in the aviation business, weather men
forecast storms and their path and pilots are informed. This knowledge (or
information) enable them avoid the storm's path. with respect to
weaknesses, I did say where a value for money matrix determines
economic/financial feasibility, then obviously, you are better off applying
its outcome. But these are more a matter of nuances. I was perhaps brief on
the more important issues, namely, the bumster and child sex issues. I
would have loved to see some reaction suggesting, for example, an IEC
strategy (information, education and communication) as an effective way of
sensitising the community to be vigilant, and, educating them of the
dangers inherent in encouraging children to go and 'make friends' with
Toubabs. Thanks.
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
|
