BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leland Torrence <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The listserv that doubts.
Date:
Wed, 7 Nov 2007 06:26:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
I remember a Zaha Hadid lecture at Yale a few years back, showing off the
imaginations for the new BMW headquarters.  I saw Vincent Scully that
morning talking about the Art of the Manmade;  The Mayan temple - "next
slide please".  Then that night I was transported to the bomb shelter which
is the Yale Art Gallery lecture Hall to hear Hadid - "animation please".  On
my way out I bumped into an architecture professor who said "Leland, what
are you doing here, I thought you were a restoration specialist".  Next
question, please.
Best,
Leland

Leland R. S. Torrence
Leland Torrence Enterprises and the Guild
17 Vernon Court, Woodbridge, CT  06525
Office:  203-397-8505
Fax:  203-389-7516
Mobile:  203-981-4004
E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
www.LelandTorrenceEnterprises.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: The listserv that doubts.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gabriel
Orgrease
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:14 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BP] i told him titanium would delaminate from dryvit, he
wouldn't listen!

Hammarberg, Eric wrote:
>
> I remember being at MIT soon after it was finished - MIT was gaga 
> then! I also viewed the Gehry exhibit at the Guggenheim a few years 
> ago, where they displayed some of his construction details, and 
> confirmed what we all already knew: his waterproofing details are 
> equal to all the other schlock architects who slather their plywood 
> substrates with Bituthene and cover them with expensive materials. 
> They NEVER worry about good detailing. Leaks and rot and mold will 
> soon result. More work for me! Like the 1970's Midas commercial, "You 
> can pay me now or pay me later".
>
As I recall waterproofing DETAILS for new construction were removed from 
architectural design practice some time ago with an idea that someone 
else would worry about it. Least ways the evidence in the field tends to 
lead to that sort of a reverse-engineered thought.

Yet one more example of architectural design that excludes any 
consideration of nature. I was down on the west side a few months ago 
looking at the new Gehry building with the very expensive glass and 
admired the broken glass as water cascaded down the facade... full 
exposure to the Hudson, and said to myself, "Wow, that is going to be 
fun for somebody."

It all sounds like post-post-chicken to me.

][<

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2