PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8
Date:
Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:09:12 -0600
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robert Kesterson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<op.tljy7yjmi9dzqs@localhost>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:49:00 -0600, William <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:50:18 -0500, Robert Kesterson  
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> But then what does that say about peas?  I thought peas were non-paleo?
>
> IIRC  it was an anomaly.
>
> Maybe the consumer was having a bad day/needed a laxative, whatever.

Or maybe he just thought peas looked tasty and didn't have a dietician to  
tell him they were legumes.  ;-)


-- 
   Robert Kesterson
   [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2