That's a matter of preference. <g> I prefer synthetic over recorded 
human speech because I can crank it up as I like to read at a fairly 
good clip usually. That is why I'm glad that there are both options available.

Going back to your previous post on the Solar Bible, Phil, which I 
appreciated and saved for reference: I'm just curious why you find it 
unusual to prefer the NAS over the KJV version. Do you have an issue 
with the NAS in particular or do you dislike newer translations in 
general? II am the opposite and with they had the NAS or another 
modern translation available at the same great discounted price.

Cheers,
Doris





At 07:33 PM 5/28/2007 -0600, you wrote:

>Yes, and it is much more difficult to hear.
>
>Phil.
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sharon Hooley" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 6:09 PM
>Subject: Re: Solar Bible
>
>
> > i like the idea of using solar power, but I think I prefer the digital
> > talking Bible, which may have formerly been called the Road Runner Talking
> > Bible, which I still have.  Doesn't it have more features, and faster
> > scanning capabilities?
> >
> > Sharon
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.1/822 - Release Date: 5/28/07
>11:40 AM
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/820 - Release Date: 
>5/27/2007 12:31 PM


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/820 - Release Date: 5/27/2007 12:31 PM