Yero my friend,
You missed a wonderful opportunity to earn your stripes as a prolific
journalist worth admiration. I want to thank you for your regard of me as I hold
you in equal esteem. What you failed to do was to assist Jabou in recognizing
where I called the southside of Chicago as "Shitside". You did not share with
us where I did, nor did you advise due-diligence and honour in community.
Allah would have loved you for it. We must not worry too much about Haruna for
his life is an open book for all to see and comment on. Our individual
relations with Allah and Community hold more gravitasse and hope for our own
salvations. I am a bit disappointed in you too. I am not sure why you found it
valuable to drag Ousman's name in your "mediation". Ousman is a solid Human. He has
demonstrated that to us all. Ousman will not malign any in this community
for expediency sakes. I advise you forgive his name from soil.
Your "friend" Haruna. I encourage you to work further to stand up for truth
for life's worth. For Rabbil Aalameen sakes.
In a message dated 12/17/2007 12:40:34 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Sister Jabou & Ousman,
Ousman, greetings there! I keenly followed the debate of my friend Haruna. I
think that he is too much into this Edwards fellow to an extent, far in his
support of him-'el d' gore.' Having said that, he deserves a pardon from both
you and Jabou. If Haruna were of the Black Panthers like my friend, Dr.
Larry Pinkney, that would have been another excuse I would take from him, for the
later alleged of Obama’s pretentious black blood but dines the opposite.
Further that he boycotted their rallies. I will check my archives to forward the
said piece which I didn’t end up publishing. But it is obvious if Obama
joins them in their activism, there is a tendency to loose the opposites' support
today. So he (Obama) is playing his politics well.
On the other hand, Haruna’s John Edward Darboe won’t make a bad president
like some of the world’s characters observed, notably Bush and Blair moving
the world to wars. That’s a complete turn-off.
In my view, Obama is a hope for liberation for both the minorities and the
many others trapped in the ‘color’ panorama. The latest smear campaign
against the guy about attending ‘dara’ at younger age, or being from a Muslim
family is in fact a plus to the guy. The Clinton Campaign is not scoring points
with it. In fact, hardly will any listen to them. If such is to be raised at
all, then that would violate the very religious tolerance they are preaching.
It brings to memory our Muslim brother in Congress from Minnesota whose
records of modesty is in the open-The Honorable Keith Ellision (May God prolong
his life.) The US congress came to disarray upon his decision to take oath
using the Holy Quran then. The ‘storms in the tea-cups’ then were not justified
because what you believe in, take oath with it.
Lastly, Haruna missed the beauty of Chicago when he had an opportunity to
grace UGAMA on Labor Day (September 2007) at the mid-west conference. He was no
where to be seen or heard on the phone despite numerous fruitless efforts,
but those that did will not tease at Chicago in the way he did.
So my challenge to him is to layout John Edward Darboe’s plan of actions.
Otherwise, thanks for the debate, and all three of you have some educative
points.
Regards,
Yero.
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:39:50 -0500> From: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re:
John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou.> To: [log in to unmask]> > Amen, Ms
Jabou you said it all.> > > -----Original Message-----> From: [log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]> Sent: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 8:11 am> Subject: Re:
John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou.> > > > Haruna,> I have to confess that you lost
my interest when you delved into "Chicago > hitside" Chicago shitside?> ren't
you just a tad bit angry for a discussion that is supposed to help you > in
friends and influence people on behalf of the candidate you profess to >
upport?> fter reading your last response, I had a hard time trying to discern
whether > ours was a personal anger towards Barack Obama because he was of mixed
race, > ttended Harvard and was president of the Harvard Law Review, or was a
community > rganizer in the South side of Chicago and failed to include all
the Ghettos in > he United States in that effort and you think all of these
are supposed to be > ndictments against him or if your truly feel that the
way to promote Edwards > as to drag his opponents in the gutter?> I guarantee
you that if you ran your response by any camp of the Edwards > ampaign, they
would have asked you not to post it.> have never seen John Edwards drag his
opponents reputation or record in the > utter because he is intelligent enough
to know that this is hardly a way to win > otes and that people are sick and
tired of this sort of senseless tirades.> ohn Edwards speaks about how in his
youth, he witnessed lawyers and judges in > is native South Carolina> >
stand up against racism during the civil rights era and how they risked their >
ives and had to be escorted to work by Federal Marshalls and yet, they kept >
n. He speaks of the admiration he had for these people standing up against >
acism. He would not wonder if people would vote for Obama because he is of >
ixed race.> Edwards may have sued insurance companies and won some
judgements against them, > ut that has not resulted in any changes that prevent
insurance companies > inding loopholes to pay out claims. Just ask the victims of
Katrina.> nd the case for which Edwards won the largest judgement was for a
family whose > hild got her hair or was it a limb caught in the drainage
system of a swimming > ool.> What supporters of the various candidates should
concentrate on is to present > hat their candidate can do for the people when
elected so they can convince > oters that they are the right person and how they
do t hat matters a great > eal. Engaging in maligning the other candidate
as a strategy to win supporters > ever works and tends to be symptomatic of
some personal issue the those who > ngage in it may have. Also, when
supporters engage in the latter, they become > iabilities as opposed to being assets.>
ake it easy Haruna, rage does not draw in people, it makes them head in the
> pposite direction and it is bad for the heart. It is the people who will
have > he last word.> ow, I shall leave you to it.> abou > > > -----Original
Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>> o:
[log in to unmask]> ent: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 6:44 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/
Haruna/Jabou.> > > > > > > Haruna," Jabou.> Yes Ma'am, hope all's well. Good to hear
you again.> > Too long winded so I will be brief." Jabou.> > cannot for the
life of me, believe mine own ears. Jabou? Dis-ease for > ong-windedness? As
Rocco Mediate is wont to quip of Tiger, If there ever were a > > ood time to
die, I'm red to go. Jabou, I'm extremely sorry for my long winds. > I will have
been remiss were I not to have been comprehensive with your > ueries of John
Edwards. In addition, I intended to share other value-added > rocess for
discernment.> > remmembered a good friend of mine, Corporate attorney Charles
McClure > hared, "Haruna, our job is to discourage our clients' customers from
desiring > etail and comprehension without running roughshod to minimalist
law. My > lients include Insurance Agencies and multi-national corporations".
The ones > ho > eem to own just about everything Jabou. "And, when it comes to
any challenge > n courts of law, we encourage fellow corporate attorneys and
judges, to > eview the entire constitution, ammendments, and precedent law".
I knew the > reat > harles was unto something. This is exactly the reason
why John Edwards > hooses cases carefully for advocacy sakes. I enjoy your long
winds from Foroyaa > > abou. I know you were being sarcastic but it struck
me befuddled.> > ow then.> > Just a few important points." Jabou.> > es.
Let'r Rip!> > Edwards fought corporate America on behalf of his clients as a
litigation > ttorney." Jabou.> > ndeed. John Edwards challenged the parts of law
that Insurance and drug > ompanies relied on to stifle claims for errors and
omissions. Indeed. Indeed. > ohn Edwards litigated profusely and with all his
might, for his clients, the > lliterate of law, the powerless to challenge
wrongdoing, and in the process, > e forced clarifications of hitherto
un-interpreted law to yield precedent > hat discouraged the culprit corporations and
other from taking refuge in > mbiguity. I am sorry Jabou. Sometimes you must
be long-winded to yield value > ontext and comprehension. I am told long
directional winds can be harnessed > or > nergy.> > When he won on behalf of
those clients, he was paid very well for his > fforts." Jabou.> > would suppose
so. Lawyers, like carpenters, doctors, masons, engineers, > nd dishwashers,
must receive value for effort and productivity. John Edwards > id not choose
to litigate just any infringement. The ones he chose to > itigate have
national and constitutional dimensions. His remuneration came > rom > hatever the
judge determines is just penalty or compensation for victims and > heir
advocate lawyer. The fees for lawyers are communicated to their clients > rior to
representation. They are normally a percentage of the settlement or > enalty
for corporate wrongdoing. Whether John Edwards was paid very well or > ot, is
not terribly significant to me. Whatever he was paid, he invested > eavily in
his foundations (the poverty center, One America, The Ninth ward of > ew
Orleans, Carolina's poor and dispossessed. All while his wife Libby was > nder
doctor's care for terminal illness. Barak, like his wife, is an > ccomplished
lawyer. They chose to side with corporate interests that John > dwards > erves
notice to. Comparative values my dear.> > He did not offer his services
gratis when he sued those corporations." > abou.> > should think not. Besides he
has his wife's medical bills to pay and his > hildren to raise. Further, were
he to have lost any of the cases, he will not > ave been compensated for his
fees were reliant on his victory over evil and > urisprudent compensation
therefrom. That is why John Edwards represented > he indigent and those of
lesser means than his fees would require. He was > onfident in the victory of
good over evil, and he took enormous risks of loss.> > Perhaps you can share
with us the major changes that came about as a result > f Edwards winning these
lawsuits." Jabou.> > 'm sorry I must be long to do your query justice my
Jabou.> > . When we desire democracy, whose cardinal tenet is The rule of common
> aw, we desire that the common comprehends law that contains the rights and
> rivileges whose aversion by other should trigger judicious challenge. In a
> ociety where there are some (possibly one partner to that law), who are >
blivious > o this rule of law and democracy indigents harp on about. That is
where the > eed for lawyers comes in. They are the bedrock of due-diligence
and > emocracy. John Edwards being a lawyer, intrinsically accrues value to
any > ociety > n which he practices.> > . Lawyers choose from several areas of
practice. Not all lawyers choose > ases for advocacy for the indigent. John
Edwards chose advocacy law. He is > aluable to democracy and equal justice
under the law.> > . When John Edwards wins his cases, a precedent in law is
established so > hat no matter which of the contiguous United States including
Hawaii that are > artner to the constitution, may rely on such precedent. That
assists in > iscouraging fraudulent practice by rogue corporations who seem
to own just > bout > verything.> > . Jabou, you and I, though never among
John Edwards' direct clientele, are > urrently benefitting from John Edwards'
legal victories. For the specific > aws and precedent, I refer you to the
public records of John Edwards' cases.> > Speaking of votes that have had a major
impact on American lives, I would > ay none top that list more than the Iraq
war." Jabou.> > ow do you mean??? I beg to differ. I do agree that the senate
of which John > dwards was a part, approved a military campaign to apprehend
Saddam and > ring him to answer to charges of mass murder and belligerent
foreboding. Many > raquis, Iranians, and Kuwaitis lost their lives and
liberties at the hand of > addam. Perhaps I would agree with you that the campaign
was badly > rosecuted. For which Edwards cannot be to blame. He saw fit
however, to > pologise for > hatever part he may have played in the cantankerous
prosecution of a > ampaign of conscience. A Solid Human. I make no apologies
for John Edwards.> > and Edwards voted for the war" Jabou.> > ohn Edwards voted
along with his coleagues to approve a military campaign > n Iraq. Not for
the Iraq war we now witness. He is being magnanimous in > emorse of poor
prosecution of the campaign. I would like John Edwards to > pprove > military
campaign against me in that manner. And I will not require apology > f him.> > and
it has impacted American lives as well altered how America is viewed > y the
World forever." Jabou.> > ndeed. Anything America does, impacts on the lives
of Americans and world > itizens in a big way. That is why circumspect and
due-diligence is advised in > rosecutions of campaigns.> > Haruna, your
amazingly harsh rhetoric against Obama is bordering on the > swift boat" strategy
of the last elections." Jabou.> > am not familiar with the Swift Boat
incident. I therefore do not consider > t in demarches. I am sorry you regard our
exchange here as harsh rhetoric > gainst Obama for on mine own part, I know no
personal cause to spurn at him, > ut for the general. Besides, in my effort
to solicit support for John > dwards, it will be utterly foolhardy to offend
other, including Obama. You and > I > ust leave open, the prospect of future
collaboration between John Edwards and > arack Obama. Here, we engage in
studious discernments and recognition of > omparative values. I advice temperance
toward John Edwards.> > you don't want the angry label being made against
your candidate to be true > or his supporters." Jabou.> > hould the angry label
be self-fulfilling against John Edwards, We will > nvent commensurate
compassion and understanding. We are children of God/Allah. > > abbil Aalameen.> >
Enough of negative campaigning already! Another reason why Obama is a > reath
of fresh air?" Jabou.> > ndeed Obama is a breath of fresh air. John Edwards
is Freshivating.> > Have a good weekend." Jabou.> > hank you my sister. As if
Allah was aware of your prayer. I made merry and > roduced value for other
this weekend. I pray for your glorious sustenance > ll weekends. Thank you for
the prayer.> > our bestest brother, Haruna.> -----Original Message----->
rom: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>> o: [log in to unmask]> ent:
Sat, 15 Dec 2007 3:54 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna> > > > > >
"Haruna," Jabou.> > es Darling, how are you. I like the way you speak and what you
say always. > ou have an immensely powerful voice fertilized, as our friend
Karim is > ont > o drammatize, by prolific study, acumen, and measured tone.
Any candidate > ould like to have your support. I'm not giving up on Ousman
either. I love > im > very much. Just don't get any funny ideas Ousman.> "I do
not know that what Edwards can represent to the American people is > ot the
same as what Obama will." Jabou.> I was under the same impressions too. Then I
began a study of senators who > ater run for President in a revolutionarily
different way that reviews > arginal values. There is a wealth of information
that when properly > eviewed > r > eviewed in the directions of questions one
might have when making marginal > istinction assessments, you will come
away with a benign but discerning > onclusion. If you review the matters/bills
that Clinton, Obama, and > dwards > ave > ffered votes on in the senate, (not
the ones Obama and Clinton > onveniently > bsented themselves on for
expediency sakes), you can draw important > emographic information from their affect
on Americans, both in quantity > nd > uality > hat has brought me to the
conclusion that Edwards is a more valuable > hange to > more Americans than
either Obama or Clinton. I had also come to the > onclusion that Obama will be a
more valuable change to immigrant Americans > han > ither Edwards or Clinton,
and that Clinton is the hungriest of them all to > > ecome President. Take a
look at how many bills Obama and Clinton absented > hemselves from voting on
and find out what those bills are. Then look at > he > ills > ll three voted
on and you will notice that Edwards never absented himself > rom voting on
critical and significant matters as well as those matters > hat > re
politically inexpedient to vote on. A solid human.Let us know how your > eview looks
like.> "Also, I do not think that there is any indication that Obama beileves
in > eligion as other than a moral compass." Jabou.> Probably not and I did
not qualify Obama's belief in that realm. I shared > dwards' belief in the
realm.> bama had recognized the value of religious congregations and the almost
> omplete patronage of evangelists by Republicans. Given his political >
ndustriousness, he embarked on a campaign to wrest a slice of this section > f >
ociety > rom Republicans and rightly so. I happen to believe that you neither
court > or discount the religious evangelist vote. You allow them to choose
> ithout > iving the facade of their participation as a group in governance
and > dministration of the state. An active campaign to woo them trends too >
losely > o > uid-pro-quo and if you do not deliver their perceived quid,
they can > everely > align your administration. Only a seasoned governor and
policy-maker can > ecognize these subtle flaws in character. Because as you
know, the > vangelists > are active voters and they vote in order to skew public
policy in favour of > > heir religion. They do not hide their intentions and
motives. It takes a > trong character to resist the temptation to maligned
judgement. When you > sk > bama, he frames his responses this way:> We have to
show America that Democrats too care about religion". That > tatement itself
says a lot about his dispensation. Jabou, I know that you > re a > devout
muslim. Have you ever felt like you have to show me and Suntou and > alanding
how much you care about Islam? If you begin to run for President, > nd > you
then embark on an active campaign to show us how much you care about > slam, >
hether that is good or not, would it not give me pause in distinctions? Our >
riend Ousman shared that Obama fought for the downtrodden in the south side
> f Chicago. I will share more on this later but that southside vote was >
hat > ained Obama the state seat against an incumbent democrat, also African >
merican. When you delve deeper into Obama's activities in South Chicago, > ou
> ill come to the realisation that there are other communities in Chicago >
hat > ere down-trodden for one reason or the other. But Obama chose these
other > own-trodden people of South Chicago. Edwards running as senator in North
> arolina fought for the down-trodden in other areas of North Carolina, >
outh > arolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Massachussetts, Alabama, and >
alifornia. > peak with Jimmy Carter and ask him to share his views on Obama
and > dwards. He > will tell you he loves both of them but that Edwards is
more valuable to > ll > merica than Obama. It is not because Edwards is white
and more Americans > re white that is why we say this. It is because of the
quality of his > alues > nd since African Americans are disproportionately
disenfranchised in all > tates, they received the value of Edwards' efforts more
than Whites. > dwards > oes not apologise for that. When the question arose in
one of the debates > bout > bama being black and Clinton being a woman, John
Edwards responded, and in > > ublic, that whoever does not vote for Obama
because he is black, or > linton > ecause she is a woman, he, John Edwards does
NOT want your vote. Now the > ntrained eye will view this as political
suicide and indeed it costed > dwards > ome white support because they began
labelling him as an angry candidate. > f > ourse they cannot make a distinction
between anger and passion and half of > hose idiots belong in an insane asylum
anyways, we just don't have a > omprehensive mental health intitution in the
US that is why some of these > etards > ind their way on talk shows and
radio programs and TV interviews. Obama > as a > een eye on the Presidency, has
had even before the "grassroots downtrodden > dvocacy" in SOuth Shitown.> "As
for being beholden to corporate America, well, all American presidents > re
somewhat beholden to corporate America, and the difference is perhaps > ust >
matter of degrees." Jabou.> Let us say you are right in the immediate above.
You are therefore > dmitting > hat corporate America does command inordinate
and a formidable power to > oerce American Presidents. The same will
therefore be true of Evangelic > merica. Now Edwards actually challenged the powers
of corporate America in > he > court of law and won overwhelmingly. He
therefore helped stem the cancer in > orporate America and enhanced the good in it
for the prosperity of America. > n > his campaign speeches when he ran with
Kerry and now, he has always served > otice that he is immune to corporate
control, no matter how formidable that > ay > be. And another thing. I think
your recognition that both Edwards and Obama > ill represent refreshing change
in the American Presidency gives you hope > hat > the two will be different
from past American Presidents. We all therefore > ake solace in the idea of an
Edwards or Obama Presidency. You will however > > gree with me that in
America, Just being President does not innoculate the > rdinary American from the
relentl;ess onslaught of Pharmaceutical and > ther > orporate interests. We
must therefore go further than just the Presidency > f > t > s the refreshing
change we are really interested in. It has come to light > hat most of Obama's
advisors are leftover Clinton advisors. You may > emmember > hen one of
those advisors disrespectfully tried to malign the former > resident Bill
Clinton. And Obama shared with us that the former Clinton > dvisor was > peaking of
his past relations with Bill Clinton and therefore he, Obama is > ot privy
to that and cannot say anything on it. And the former Clinton > dvisor is now
an Obama advisor. Discernments. I also would like our > rother > nd > riend
Ousman to share with us one tangible value accrued from Obama's > campaign for
down-trodden votes in south SHitown". It is evident that the > nited > teel
workers of America, The united Mine Workers of the same nation, The >
arpenters Union, and many more see more value in John Edwards than Obama, > linton,
or other. Is there a national union of the un-employed of South > hicago? We
> ay be presented with mirages of "grassroots campaign for votes" and >
grassroots conscientious advocacy".> "Having said that, Obama has spoken out
against the insurance companies who > re at the top of the food chain when it
comes to corporate America because > hey own just about everything." Jabou.>
Exactly my point Jabou. First, you should never speak against any corporate > r
individual interest because they own just about everything. That is the >
rong impetus. Now John Edwards did not stop at speaking out against rogue >
orporate policies, he challenged them in courts on the behalf of Americans > nd >
overcame their enormous powers. He is only a lawyer as was Obama. Has Obama
> > iled suit against any rogue corporate policy on the behalf of the common
> merican? Those insurance companies he "spoke out against", has he >
hallenged > hem > n a court of law on the merits or demerits of his disdain of them?
Obama > as head of the Harvard Law Review. If Obama finds himself in a
situation > here > vote-counting can yield a loss of his election to a Republican
candidate, > hat do you think will happen? What do you think Obama will do?>
"You are right, I like both Edwards and Obama, and I think that Edwards is >
> reat candidate, but I do not think that he will win the primaries." Jabou.>
I think you are looking at the polls of those who view Edwards as an angry >
andidate. Look deeper and follow the citizens of Iowa, New Hampshire, > outh
> arolina, and Nevada. We are talking about primaries aren't we???? Check >
round your neck of the woods around Cleveland Tennessee, Chattanooga, >
emphis, > ashville, Jackson, Milan, etcetera. Let us know what you find out.> "He
is good but America sees him as having been part of the old > stablishment
even if only because he ran before." Jabou.> I know you're just being
sarcastic here. Who among all candidates, > epublican or Democratic, has not been
part of the old Establishment. Don't > e > wayed > y cliches of these lunatics
who fell through the administrative cracks for > ack of enough space at
rehab.> "I think Obama on the other hand stands a very good chance of winning the >
rimaries and Americans are angry enough at the republicans so that none of >
heir candidates stands a chance in the national elections, no matter who >
hey > re." Jabou.> Indeed Jabou. I agree with you. Obama does stand a very
good chance of > inning at least one of the primaries if not all. As far as the
anger of > mericans > t Republicans, I presume you share that all the
democratic candidates > tand > qual chances when pitted against a Republican. We can
all cherish that but > et us focus for now on the voting democrats for the
democratic primaries. > hat we are trying to discern is "EDwards, Obama, or
Clinton, who represents > he > most valuable and desirable change for
Democratic Americans". After the > rimaries, we will change our effort by removing the
word democratic from > ur > uery.> "So a wonderful and winning strategy for
Democrats this time would be an > bama/Edwards ticket." Jabou.> That
wouldn't be a bad ticket either. If that ends up being the ticket it > ould be
formidable. It will be more formidable against the Republicans in > ll > f America
if it turns out to be Edwards-Biden, Edwards-Clinton, > dwards-Obama, or
Edwards-Gore. What do you think????> "Together, they can restore the hopes of
the people and make great headway > owards reversing the damage that the last 8
years of a Bush > dministration > as done" Jabou.> Anything is a refreshing
change from the last 8 years of cluelessness.> "Thanks for providing the link
to Ousman's blog, I had not known of it > efore. As for Andrew Young Ousman,
he dances to the music of corporate > merica > and so he has to pay the
piper so no surprises there. He has now made a > areer > f leading the pillagers
and plunderers into Africa. Dr King is no doubt > urning in his grave."
Jabou.> This is not fair. I have contributed in forming a comprehensive alliance
> gainst my person and Edwards' person. This is not fair Jabou and Ousman. >
he > wo of you simply are too overwhelming even if I summon the entire
essence > f my > very being. Please have mercy on me from here on in or pledge not
to gang up > gainst me and Edwards.> "Jabou" > What Friggin-ever. You mean
Jabou and Ousman, don't you?? Whew. New > ambians!!> Haruna.> > > ----Original
Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>> o:
[log in to unmask]> ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:26 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna>
> > > > > Jabou, you know you are beautiful. I can never get upset at you.>
I think you like both John Edwards and Obama, but that you like Obama more >
ecause his election will represent much needed change.> Would you consider
that the election of John Edwards will also represent > hange?> The work
therefore is in discerning between John Edwards and Obama, who is > he more
desirable change!!!> Now, like you about John Edwards, I like Obama a lot because I
think he is > rilliant, popular, and his election will give hope to a lot of
Immigrant > mericans.> John Edwards not only represents hope for more
Americans than Obama, he has > > hown the value of the change that he may accrue
us. I have not had the > pportunity to witness a sampling of Obama's change
except that he looks > ifferent > rom past presidents.> John Edwards' One Americ
a Foundation offers some hope.> ohn Edwards' rebuilding efforts in the Lower
Ninth ward offer hope in what > > merica can be.> ohn Edwards fought with
Huge corporate outfits on the behalf of regular > nd > ommon Americans, and John
Edwards and Obama are both lawyers.> enator John Edwards of North carolina
will get dirty for you and with you.> orth Carolina used to be the home of
Senator Jesse Helms.> ohn Edwards enjoys enormous peer support and the most
endorsements from > emocratic governors of states than either Obama or Clinton.>
ohn Edwards is more electable across the United states than any candidate >
urrently seeking the presidency, Republican or Democrat. Check the stats.>
ibby Edwards is beautiful and is not beholden to corporate America. Mrs. > bama
is beautiful but may be beholden to corporate America. She sits on > he >
board of Walmart.> ohn Edwards is handsome and is not given to religious
distinctions nor > oes > e believe religion ought to be mixed with governance. John
Edwards > elieves > n Religion as moral and ethical compass, not
administrative compass.> Obama is good. John Edwards is more valuable to all America.
Edwards-Obama > ay be formidable. What do you think my dear? Lemme know, Lemme
know!! You > now > usman is an Obama-head!!! Don't you??> Your friend and
colleague Haruna. > In a message dated 12/13/2007 8:40:01 P.M. Mountain Standard
Time, > [log in to unmask] writes:> Haruna,> I both like and have a great deal of
respect for John Edwards and his wife > lizabeth for many reasons, some of
which are mentioned below. However, > > m > n Obama supporter myself. I also
think Obama has a better chance of > eing > lected because among other
things, he is seen as the "change" candidate > y > country that desperately needs
change and Hillary ain't it. Infact, I > hink Hillary has turned into a "snake
oil sales lady" and she is > verything to > everyone in her zeal to be
president and I do not trust her at all and the > est of the country is beginning
to see through her. I think that Edwards' > est > shot will be as a V.P for
Obama. I think together they would make an > wesome > eam.> ow, now, don't get
too upset.> abou> > > > > ----Original Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo
<[log in to unmask]>> o: [log in to unmask]> ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007
6:49 pm> ubject: I wish to share John Edwards with you:> > > > > > e just
concluded another conference call with David Medina, the national > > ampaign
director for John Edwards.> We are excited about the prospects for a John Edwards
Presidency. We are > leased to have the support of Harry Belafonte and Danny
Glover in South > arolina. Our gratitude to the United Steel workers Union,
The Mine > orkers > Union, > he Carpenters Union, and Friends of the Earth
Action Network. I am proud > f > ohn Edwards' performance in the just concluded
democratic candidate > ebate > > ponsored by the Des Moines Register. John
Edwards is humble, intelligent, > nd > tands up for the Common American even
on unpopular issues. He has vision > > nd > haracter, attributes that are
extremely valuable to American foreign > olicy > nd stature in the world.> We
would like volunteers to assist in South Carolina, Iowa, Nevada, and > ew >
Hampshire. We also wish to ask for your financial support if your time > ill > ot
allow volunteering. Please visit us at _http://www.johnedwards.com_ >
http://www.johnedwards.com) and thank you for your support and company > oward > >
ne-America.> Haruna.> > > > *************************************See AOL's
top rated recipes > http://food.aol.
com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤> o
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >
nterface> t: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> To Search in the
Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> o contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:>
[log in to unmask]>
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤> > > > >
_______________________________________________________________________> ore new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - >
ttp://webmail.aol.com> > o unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go
to the Gambia-L Web > nterface> t:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> o contact the List Management, please
send an e-mail to:> [log in to unmask]> > >
________________________________________________________________________> More new features than
ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com> >
����������������������������������������������������������> To
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
interface> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> > To Search
in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:>
[log in to unmask]>
����������������������������������������������������������>
_________________________________________________________________
Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_122007
**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
|