Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:20:59 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
While that is true I would still vote for someone who is not afraid
to stand up for their ideas. The fact is with all the input Congress
gets on these issues they are supposed to explain the best options to
the population and let them know what they think is the best course
of action. I hate the way politics is now. And I've spent quite a bit
of my life engaged in it. I was on the California Democratic State
Exec Comm when Nancy Pelosi Chaired that body.
At 12:41 PM 8/25/2007, you wrote:
>Yes but let's face it - politics has become so much marketing to the
>masses that you have to appeal to the widest segment of the population
>to win -- and then if the majority isn't big enough, it's up to the
>Electoral College and then the Supreme Court.
>
>Kat
>
>Linda Walker wrote:
> > Sorry I disagree. It's up to the parties to lead the people by giving
> > them the hard truth, not just talking to win. I am disgusted with the
> > Democrats for not standing strongly for peace and negotiation over
> > war. I like Gore. I'd love to see Kerry with his exotic wife as First
> > Lady and I like Edwards best right now.
> > I'm scared of Romney of course and everyone should go see September
> > Dawn, the movie about the Mormon massacre of an immigrant train. This
> > is still how the fundamentalists believe and it is frightening. Altho
> > some commentators have said this is not the Mormons and criticized the
> > wording of the sermons in the movie the fact is they used the sermons
> > practically word for word and Brigham Youngs bloody sermons are
> > available on the net. 1857 was a brutal period in the history of the
> > Mormons and they have still not removed blood atonement doctrine from
> > their so called good books.
> >
> > At 12:01 PM 8/25/2007, you wrote:
> >> Com'on you know she can't say anything definite. She's got a nomination
> >> to win first and then an election. I really do wish Gore would run
> >> because I like his environmental policy the best. We wuz robbed in
> >> 2000. Yes, I'm still angry about that.
> >>
> >> Kat
> >>
> >> Linda Walker wrote:
> >> > I don't like Hilary for this reason. She has been wishy washy on the
> >> > war. I will vote for anyone who voted against the war from the
> >> > beginning. Probably won't have a choice to do that though so I will
> >> > vote for the lesser of two evils again. If only we could have back
> >> > those good old Ike Republicans I might even vote for them.
> >> > At 11:42 AM 8/25/2007, you wrote:
> >> >> Ken, we are in the *ss so far we can't see daylight anymore. Hillary
> >> >> knows this. Eisenhower was right when he criticized the American
> >> >> military industrial corporations. For those too young to remember:
> >> >>
>
> >> >> http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html
> >> >>
> >> >> For a Republican, Ike was wise.
> >> >>
> >> >> ---- Original message ----
> >> >> >Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:52:43 -0700
> >> >> >From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >> >Subject: Re: It's things like this...
> >> >> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >may i ask why hilery will not commit to taking all
> >> >> >troops out of iraq. inquiring mind.....
> >> >>
> >>
> >> -----------------------
> >>
> >> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
> >>
> >> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
> >
> > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
|
|