Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:56:19 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Phillip,
Either the Ultra ATA 133 or ATA 100 will work. The ATA spoec says that
either 66, 100, 0r 133 will work (with the driver or interface slowing down
to match) to be backwards compatible.
The Ultra SCSI is a completely different type of interface and will not
work, and as you mention, SATA won't work either unless the MB has SATA
ports. (there is such a thing as an ATA to SATA adapter, but isn't practical
as long as ATA drives are still available).
Russ Poffenberger
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Personal Computer Hardware discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 10:46 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] HD replacement compatibility
Thanks for the reply Ray and the links which were very informative but I
still have the basic question of what will or won't work in my PC. I mostly
use
it for web browsing (dial-up) and word processing. No gaming or other
resource
hogging activities. So performance needs are minimal.
Hard drives on the before-mentioned sites are listed as IDE Ultra ATA 100,
IDE Ultra ATA 133, Ultra320 SCSI (60 and 80 pin)and SATA. I know I can't
use
the SATA but am in a quandry as to which of the others would be compatible.
Also, if I do use a HD that doesn't use the ultra DMA standard, will I have
to make an adjustment in the Bios to accomadate it?
Thanks for any suggestions as I'm afraid my present drive is about to
jump
ship!!!
The NOSPIN Group has added a new feature on our website,
web based bulletinboard for questions and answers:
Visit our sister website at http://nospin.com
|
|
|