BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:39:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (170 lines)
Hi Steve;

I just switched back to the 2000 and, everything is working according to 
plan.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] LDG TW-1


> Frankly, John, for the oney you can't beat the TS-2000.
>
> You'll get more coverage and more features on the 2000 compared with the 
> 746Pro.
> And, I don't think the receive performance is much different with the 746 
> and
> weighed against its difficult menu navigation, the 2000 is a better deal.
>
> If you're really more into contesting, then you might look at the 756Pro, 
> but of
> course, you give up VHF for that rig and paty almost twice what you would 
> for a
> 2000.
>
> Steve, K8SP
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 10:39 AM
> Subject: Re: LDG TW-1
>
>
> Well, given that I"m looking like I might improve my financial situation
> with in the next year enough to buy a new HF radio, I like the sound of 
> the
> 746 pro on the air, but after a review, if you will, like this one, I'm 
> back
> to my original thought of the TS-2000. I think I might have to talk some 
> one
> in to a ride up to HRO where I can really sit down and play with the 746 
> pro
> and TS-2000 between now and then. Not sure if I could be happy with the 
> 480
> but if the price came down some, it could be a backup radio down the road 
> a
> few years, there's just a lot I don't care for on that radio though if I 
> was
> going mobile HF I might be considering it.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: LDG TW-1
>
>
>> Hi Brian;
>>
>> Since mid OCT. of 06 I have been through three HF radios.
>>
>> ICOM 746 PRO
>>
>> ICOM 7000
>>
>> and,  the
>>
>> KENWOOD 480
>>
>> I came full circle and went back to the TS-2000 with the HEIL ProSet 5
>> headset.
>>
>> With or without the hand mic, the 2000 just blows everything else out of
>> the
>> water on both transmit and receive.
>>
>> With the above radios I mentioned, I always felt as though I were in a
>> pile
>> up.
>>
>> Most everyone would ask me to repeat my transmissions.
>>
>> It was really nerve racking.
>>
>> Now, that I am on the 2000 if I whisper, people can hear me with the HEIL
>> headset or the hand mic without any problem.
>>
>> The receive audio is very pleasant to listen to as well.
>>
>> The other radios were either too sharp or not sharp enough or not enough
>> bass.
>>
>> Needless to say I won't be changing again any time soon.
>>
>> 73  De Anthony W2AJV
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>>
>>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>>  From: K5IN
>>  To: [log in to unmask]
>>  Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 12:29 AM
>>  Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] LDG TW-1
>>
>>
>>  Luke,
>>
>>  You make me feel better about my TS-2000!
>>
>>  I have found the same to be true.  I do however have the tw2 also and
>> will
>>  have to see how accurate it is on 6 meters.  I was thinking my ts-2000
>> was
>>  having a problem with the finals or something!
>>
>>  Brian, k5in
>>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>>  From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>>  To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>  Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:18 PM
>>  Subject: Re: LDG TW-1
>>
>>
>>  > Hi.
>>  >
>>  > I use this meter.  For 160 thru 10 meters, it works fine.  At six
>> meters,
>>  > they claim that it works, gbut I find the accuracy on 6 meters to be
>>  > questionable at best, especially for making power measurements.  It
>> would
>>  > indicate that all three of my 6 meter radios are only putting out 
>> about
>>  > 50%
>>  > of their rated output, and the fact that it is consistent across all 
>> of
>>  > them is mighty suspicious.
>>  >
>>  > 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>  >
>>  > At 08:54 AM 3/13/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>>  >>After reviewing the archives, I am putting out the subject again.
>>  >>I would like  feedback from anyone using the LDG TW-1  Talking
>> Wattmeter.=
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>Thanks
>>  >>
>>  >>John  KC2QJB
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>--
>>  >>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>  >>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>  >>Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.11/723 - Release Date:
>> 3/15/2007
>>  >>11:27 AM
>>  >
>>  > Louis Kim Kline
>>  > A.R.S. K2LKK
>>  > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>  > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>  > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2