Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:56:08 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Everyone;
Their are no products that can compare with JAWS.
Unfortunately, JAWS is a necessary evil.
That being said, I can't say it enough that Freedom Scientific is not the
problem.
The list administrators, the dictators, are the problem.
As far as I know that list is independent of Freedom Scientific.
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Canazzi" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] I WAS BOUNCED FROM THE JAWS MAILING LIST!!!
> Hi Howard,
>
> At the risk of starting World War III, which adaptive products do you use
> that are substantially better and substantially cheaper.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 4:24 PM
> Subject: Re: I WAS BOUNCED FROM THE JAWS MAILING LIST!!!
>
>
> Their are better and or cheaper products for everything they
> make. The sad thing is that they have most of their market share
> because the people who make the state decisions know nothing about
> the workings of adaptive technology for the blind, so they go with
> what they have always gone with. This has nothing to do with lowest
> bider like every other state purchase is supposed to do with. Let
> alone does that eliminate user choice, it means a waste of tax payer
> dollars.
> Nobody is held accountable for that. We all pay more both in tax
> dollars, but if we purchase their products with our money, their
> prices are higher because the market will pay that price.
>
|
|
|