BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:30:52 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (172 lines)
I put those feet under mine too, worked out great.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: Handihams, was: RE: exam


> Hi.
>
> I didn't touch mine.  It is stock, the way it came from the factory.  I
> haven't even taken the plastic off the display!  The only change I made to
> that radio was to put jumbo rubber feet on the radio to increase the air
> flow under the radio.  I thought that would just make the radio run a
> little cooler, and it seems to work.
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
> At 08:59 AM 1/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>>Hi Lou;
>>
>>That's why I will never open the receive up on any radio.
>>
>>73 De Anthony W2AJV
>>[log in to unmask]
>>ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>>
>>   ----- Original Message -----=20
>>   From: Louis Kim Kline=20
>>   To: [log in to unmask]
>>   Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:59 PM
>>   Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] Handihams, was: RE: exam
>>
>>
>>   Hi Christy.
>>
>>   One thing that I have noticed on 70 cm is that the TMG707 has a pretty 
>> =
>>
>>   wicked image response that does cause stuff from the commercial band =
>>to=20
>>   come through on the ham frequencies.  I chalked it up to living in a =
>>major=20
>>   city, and being only about one and a half miles from one of the 
>> major=20
>>   communications sites.
>>
>>   73, de Lou K2LKK
>>
>>   At 06:23 PM 1/17/2007 -0600, you wrote:
>>   >Well, the offset wasn't the problem. I checked it, and it's set to =
>>positive,
>>   >as it should be. So, either something's goofy or there's just none of 
>> =
>>those
>>   >repeaters near me, but that does seem odd considering there are eight 
>> =
>>2m
>>   >repeaters I can at least key up, three of them I know I hit well even 
>> =
>>on
>>   >five watts.
>>   >
>>   >I'm a bit hesitant to run the radio on 35 watts, mostly because even =
>>if the
>>   >antenna can handle it, I'm not sure about RF exposure. It's under the 
>> =
>>limit
>>   >for requiring measurements and the like, but I'm in the same room =
>>with this
>>   >antenna and I'd rather be safe than not, especially with cats around =
>>that
>>   >just looove to jump up on the filing cabinet I have it on. I know =
>>that on
>>   >ten watts, I can't key a one of them up at all though. It's hard to =
>>know if
>>   >I'm receiving or not as far as the repeaters since I don't know which 
>> =
>>ones
>>   >are really active, but I do receive some out of band stuff.
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >-----Original Message-----
>>   >From: For blind ham radio operators
>>   >[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
>>   >[log in to unmask]
>>   >Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 6:00 PM
>>   >To: [log in to unmask]
>>   >Subject: Re: Handihams, was: RE: exam
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >Christy, 70cm is harder to hit.  If you're using an antenna indoors =
>>you may
>>   >well
>>   >have problems hitting the repeater.  Run the rig on 35w if the =
>>antenna will
>>   >handle the load.  Also, if you're using a magmount try sitting it in =
>>a
>>   >frying
>>   >pan (cast iron works well for this) to get some ground plain effect.
>>   >
>>   >Rigs like the Kenwood ts570 have a built-in antenna tuner.
>>   >
>>   >Since you have a computer you can get a serial cable to connect to =
>>that 707
>>   >and get output if information from the radio that isn't spoken =
>>normally.
>>   >
>>   >Tom
>>   >Tom
>>   >Brennan
>>   >KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP web page
>>   >http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >--
>>   >Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>>   >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>   >Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/390 - Release Date: =
>>7/17/2006
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >--
>>   >Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>>   >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>   >Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/390 - Release Date: =
>>7/17/2006
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >--
>>   >I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>>   >It has removed 3027 spam emails to date.
>>   >Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>>   >Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >--
>>   >Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>>   >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>   >Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/390 - Release Date: =
>>7/17/2006
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >--
>>   >No virus found in this incoming message.
>>   >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>   >Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/634 - Release Date: =
>>1/17/2007=20
>>   >4:45 PM
>>
>>   Louis Kim Kline
>>   A.R.S. K2LKK
>>   Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>   Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>   Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.0/639 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
>>6:47 PM
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2