BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:26:54 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Yes, it was a good buy.  I just couldn't see paying extra money for the 
pro96 in my area.  If there was a lot of digital stuff, then I would have 
bought one.  I'm sure in the future when they upgrade the systems in this 
area, I'll have to get some kind of digital scanner.  I thing what I have 
will do for a while.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: RS PRO-96 scanner was RE: New to the list.


> I've never looked at the 97 specs until I saw how much you paid for yours. 
> I
> just realized the 97 doesn't have digital capability.  Still, $150 is a
> great price for a analogue trunking scanner.
> 73, Ken -N5SWR

ATOM RSS1 RSS2