BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:13:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (189 lines)
Of course its going to decline.
Most of the hams today are either ear retirement age, or well past
retirement age.
The question is, will it increase again in a few years once more young
people discover it.
Also, will it have a chance to come back with all the restrictions
residential areas now have on antennas.
73
Colin, CF6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [WestMichiganHams] FCC Eliminates Morse Code Requirement
(Finally!!)


> Hi.
>
> I'll make a bet with you guys that the decline in amateur radio
actually=20
> will accelerate now, rather than decelerate.
> --Lou K2LKK
>
>
> At 10:35 PM 12/15/2006 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hi, all.
> >
> >Well, when it rains, it pours, I guess.
> >
> >Here's the latest ruling by the FCC concerning the long-awaited decision
on
> >the CW requirement, and other issues.
> >
> >Many of  you know how I feel, so I won't go into it any more. ... I'll
just
> >go to bed tonight, and maybe try to make some CW contacts tomorrow on the
> >reduced CW operating frequencies we now have on HF.
> >
> >73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ, Big Rapids, MI
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Mark Thompson" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>; "Scan Illinois"
> ><[log in to unmask]>; "Chicago Scanning Club"
> ><[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>;
> ><[log in to unmask]>;
> ><[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>;
> ><[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>;
> ><[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:27 PM
> >Subject: [WestMichiganHams] FCC Eliminates Morse Code Requirement
> >(Finally!!)
> >
> >
> >FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:   NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:
> >December 15, 2006 Chelsea Fallon:  (202) 418-7991
> >
> >FCC MODIFIES AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE RULES,
> >ELIMINATING MORSE CODE EXAM REQUIREMENTS AND
> >ADDRESSING ARRL PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
> >
> >Washington, D.C. =AD Today, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
> >adopted a Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration (Order) that
> >modifies the rules for the Amateur Radio Service by revising the=
>  examination
> >requirements for obtaining a General Class or Amateur Extra Class amateur
> >radio operator license and revising the operating privileges for
Technician
> >Class licensees.  In addition, the Order resolves a petition filed by the
> >American Radio Relay League, Inc. (ARRL) for partial reconsideration of
an
> >FCC Order on amateur service rules released on October 10, 2006.
> >
> >The current amateur service operator license structure contains three
> >classes of amateur radio operator licenses:  Technician Class, General
> >Class, and Amateur Extra Class.  General Class and Amateur Extra Class
> >licensees are permitted to operate in Amateur bands below 30 MHz, while
the
> >introductory Technician Class licensees are only permitted to operate in
> >bands above 30 MHz.  Prior to today=92s action, the FCC, in accordance
with
> >international radio regulations, required applicants for General Class
and
> >Amateur Extra Class operator licenses to pass a five words-per-minute
Morse
> >code examination.
> >
> >Today=92s Order eliminates that requirement for General and Amateur Extra
> >licensees.  This change reflects revisions to international radio
> >regulations made at the International Telecommunication Union=92s 2003=
>  World
> >Radio Conference (WRC-03), which authorized each country to determine
> >whether to require that individuals demonstrate Morse code proficiency in
> >order to qualify for an amateur radio license with transmitting
privileges
> >on frequencies below 30 MHz.  This change eliminates an unnecessary
> >regulatory burden that may discourage current amateur radio operators
from
> >advancing their skills and participating more fully in the benefits of
> >amateur radio.
> >
> >Today=92s Order also revises the operating privileges for Technician
Class
> >licensees by eliminating a disparity in the operating privileges for the
> >Technician Class and Technician Plus Class licensees.  Technician Class
> >licensees are authorized operating privileges on all amateur frequencies
> >above 30 MHz.  The Technician Plus Class license, which is an operator
> >license class that existed prior the FCC=92s simplification of the
amateur
> >license structure in 1999 and was grandfathered after that time,
authorized
> >operating privileges on all amateur frequencies above 30 MHz, as well as
> >frequency segments in four HF bands (below 30 MHz) after the successful
> >completion of a Morse code examination.  With today=92s elimination of
the
> >Morse code exam requirements, the FCC concluded that the disparity
between
> >the operating privileges of Technician Class licensees and Technician
Plus
> >Class licensees should not be retained.  Therefore, the FCC, in today=92s
> >action, afforded Technician and Technician Plus licensees identical
> >operating privileges.
> >
> >Finally, today=92s Order resolved a petition filed by the ARRL for
partial
> >reconsideration of an FCC Order released on October 10, 2006 (FCC
06-149).
> >In this Order, the FCC authorized amateur stations to transmit voice
> >communications on additional frequencies in certain amateur service
bands,
> >including the 75 meter (m) band, which is authorized only for certain
> >wideband voice and image communications.  The ARRL argued that the 75 m=
>  band
> >should not have been expanded below 3635 kHz, in order to protect
> >automatically controlled digital stations operating in the 3620-3635 kHz
> >portion of the 80 m band.  The FCC concluded that these stations can be
> >protected by providing alternate spectrum in the 3585-3600 kHz frequency
> >segment.
> >
> >Action by the Commission on December 15, 2006, by Report and Order and=
>  Order
> >on Reconsideration.  Chairman Martin and Commissioners Copps, Adelstein,
> >Tate, and McDowell.
> >
> >For additional information, contact William Cross at (202) 418-0691 or
> >[log in to unmask]
> >WT Docket Nos. 04-140 and 05-235.
> >=AD FCC =AD
> >
> >News and other information about the Federal Communications Commission
> >is available at www.fcc.gov.
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> ><*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WestMichiganHams/
> >
> ><*> Your email settings:
> >     Individual Email | Traditional
> >
> ><*> To change settings online go to:
> >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WestMichiganHams/join
> >     (Yahoo! ID required)
> >
> ><*> To change settings via email:
> >     mailto:[log in to unmask]
> >     mailto:[log in to unmask]
> >
> ><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >     [log in to unmask]
> >
> ><*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> >     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753=20

ATOM RSS1 RSS2