Ndey, my post was just to answer to Sidibeh's question why the talks are now 
in the open as opposed to privately.  I have long focused on helping NADD, 
knowing that after three years of negotiations we were not going anywhere.  
Currently, who is negotiating between the two, none.  Thus, we have to focus 
on supporting our conscience because time is not waiting for us.  Trust me, 
I changed my focus and energy moons ago.  Yes, those that wish to continue 
to negotiate are Gambians and are free to continue, that is if any is 
currently engaged in such.  If unity is not possible, we got to move on and 
make hay while the sun shines.

Chi Jaama

Joe


>From: Ndey Jobarteh <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list              
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: RESubject: Re: NADD RESPONSE TO UDP/NRP ALLIANCE/joe
>Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:10:25 +0000
>
>Joe,
>
>Reading from Saihou response to Sidibeh's interventions and yours it 
>worry's me because I strongly believe that this is not a game, it is not 
>about who did what first, it is not about NADD and UNDP/NRP. The fight is 
>about getting rid of the AFPRC regime and this should be our focus no 
>matter what block we are. I have lots of issues with UDP/NRP but I believe 
>our focus and energy now is to assist the masses at home to make the right 
>decision. If we want to spend all our time and energy trashing issues 
>between the two we won't get anywhere.
>
>Those of us who are not good at negotiating should just leave it to those 
>who can. And we can move on to strategic and meaningful discussions as to 
>how to get rid of Jammeh and make Gambia a home for all. I don't know about 
>the rest of you but for me what happens in Gambia affects me directly not 
>even indirectly and therefore I see the need to be focus and strategic in 
>this difficult times.
>
>We should all concentrate our energies in getting our friends and family to 
>vote for NADD whiles negotiations are going on. I believe each and every 
>Gambian should make it their duty to get rid of this tyranny in the 
>country. The slogan should be AFPRC must go and it should be written in all 
>our minds, houses and prayers.
>
>I hope this will open a new chapter of dialogue and fruitful discussions 
>towards the September elections because the campaign has started. A lot of 
>Gambians reads the L and I believe is can contribute strongly to the down 
>fall of Jammeh if it is used properly
>The Struggle Continues!!!
>Ndey Jobarteh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: Joe Sambou Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list      
>>          To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: RESubject: Re: NADD 
>>RESPONSE TO UDP/NRP ALLIANCE (testing) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:21:55 
>>+0000
>>
>>Ndey and Sidebeh, the negotiations were forced to be public because of the 
>>games that were being played for the past three years.  When someone 
>>continuously agrees to one thing in private only to go to their supporters 
>>and say something entirely different, then the way you nip it at the bud 
>>is to bring out what was said by both parties, so the public can judge for 
>>themselves.  This way, what ever one said will be heard by all and so, one 
>>cannot manipulate the situation anymore.  Clearly, Gambians know who is 
>>being manipulative and can see what type of Gambia each is fighting for.  
>>All hands must be on deck and Gambians will catch any slight of hand in 
>>this setting.
>>
>>Chi Jaama
>>
>>Joe
>>
>>
>>>From: Ndey Jobarteh Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
>>>
>>>To: [log in to unmask] Subject: RESubject: Re: NADD RESPONSE TO 
>>>UDP/NRP ALLIANCE (testing) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:10:55 +0000
>>>
>>>Sidibeh,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  I completely agree with you but since it has found its way here, I 
>>>guess these sentences needs to be trashed and put in its proper context.
>>>
>>>   In the letter "I am to convey to you that the NADD Executive has 
>>>rejected your proposal to expand the UDP/NRP informal Alliance to include 
>>>NADD. In the same vein the proposal for the flag bearer not to have a one 
>>>term limit is also rejected. "
>>>
>>>  If UDP/NRP wants genuine alliance I believe they will have to revisit 
>>>the NADD MOU and renegotiate any provision they consider unacceptable as 
>>>stated clearly in this letter. There no need to pretend any more we have 
>>>to face the hard fact that there is a high chance that the coalition 
>>>under UDP, NRP, NDAM and PDOIs will never take place so we have to cut 
>>>our losses and rally around NADD. Those who still believe in negations to 
>>>bring the parties together can still go on but I for one think that it is 
>>>better to dedicate ones energy in strategies to bring Jammeh down come 
>>>next election.
>>>
>>>
>>>In the letter" Finally, the proposal for a new Alliance to concentrate on 
>>>changing the regime and then discuss all programs after the change has 
>>>occurred is also rejected."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  The above proposal is completely unacceptable for any serious minded 
>>>person or party. How can parties agreed to come together and then later 
>>>discuss their programs. I for one will never vote for such an alliance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  In the letter: "This is why we have suggested for UDP/NRP to revisit 
>>>the NADD MOU and renegotiate any provision they consider unacceptable. 
>>>The position of flag bearer has always been negotiable since the NADD 
>>>flag bearer had declared that he is willing to step down once a person 
>>>who can best serve as a unifying factor is found."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  I believe that UDP/NRP is given the green light and they should really 
>>>think through this and come out with a better solution. Until now they 
>>>have not come out concrete issues that need to be dealt with. Now that 
>>>the door is open for them to revisit the MOU and renegotiate, I strongly 
>>>believe that they should take this opportunity if they are genuinely in 
>>>for this alliance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  The Struggle Continues!!
>>>
>>>  Ndey Jobarteh
>>>
>>>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい To 
>>>unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L 
>>>Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>>>
>>>To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: 
>>>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the 
>>>List Management, please send an e-mail to: 
>>>[log in to unmask] 
>>>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
>>
>>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい To 
>>unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web 
>>interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>>
>>To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: 
>>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the 
>>List Management, please send an e-mail to: 
>>[log in to unmask] 
>>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
>
>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L 
>Web interface
>at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
>To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: 
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
>To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>[log in to unmask]
>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい

いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい