On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:42:29 -0400, Paleo Phil <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:31:50 -0400 William wrote:
>> The short lifespan of paleoman appears to be an article of faith.
>> If there is any evidence in support of it, please post it.
>
> I did, in my post of Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:16:30 -0400, which included
> Lawrence Angel's data.

Not good enough; when Carrie showed ( 25 Mar 2007 14:44:22) that the  
"scientists" cannot tell the difference between the bones of the aged and  
the bones of the young.

This discussion is puzzling, as lack of disease/aging is the reason why  
we  eat paleofood.
If you really believe that paleofood cannot improve health/longevity, then  
why eat it? You are going to die at 32.

William