Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:18:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Nobody knows. Also, "average" age isn't a very useful measure of
> health, because it includes child mortality, accidental deaths,
> warfare, etc.
Hi Juergen;
Actually I was thinking in terms of the diseases of older age that afflict
us (especially of cancer). I wonder if for the most part cancers would have
affected the paleolithic if they had actually lived long enough? I suspect,
like wild animals, they lived, on the average, fairly short lives (maybe
20-30). So, I wonder how much simple aging is as an important predictor of
cancer? Food and other factors (genetics, toxicity, etc.) are of course
too....
Marilyn
|
|
|