PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Kesterson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:40:05 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:26:35 -0600, Paleo Phil <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I don't go entirely by the Old World / New World thing myself, so I
> understand that. Some New World foods appear to be healthy, but the
> nightshades apparently were toxic and then bred to be less so, according  
> to what Todd posted.

I'd never heard that about tomatoes.  The *plant* (leaves, stems, roots)  
is toxic, but the fruit isn't.  As far as I know, the selective breeding  
that has been done on tomatoes was to increase the size and number or  
variety of fruits, not to detoxify.

-- 
   Robert Kesterson
   [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2