Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:05:46 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<010101c8fc06$93eaefb0$0201a8c0@DELL> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The ancestral wild aurochs were forest animals, and must have eaten lots
of leaves.
Note the similar taste of modern oxen/cattle, if there is a tree in
their pasture it is leafless as high as they can reach.
I'm guessing that leaves have something other than the composition of
grasses.
William
Rundle wrote:
> I always put this question to them all...
> that's when they usually lose interest in talking to me :-)
>
> BTW... that was me talking to Patricia the farmer and similarly many other farmers...
>
> Dedy
>
>
> From: Paleo Phil Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 12:57 AM
>
> > I've had a long chat with Patricia, the farmer about this a few years ago... got into
> > similar conversations with several other organic meat farmers re grass-
> > feeding... most seem to think that grass alone is not enough... sigh...
> > same thing with the Queen's Park farmers market [the nearest to me]...
> > no grass-fed meat there...
>
> Did you ever try asking them how they think wild beef animals or early
> cattle survived and reproduced before people started feeding them grains,
> and later soy and other glop, or how pure grass-fed beef cattle survive
> today, such as the vast majority of the cattle in Florida? :-)
>
>
>
|
|
|