BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:22:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Steve,

I've had two HD radios for about a month now, and from what I've seen, you 
need a pretty noise-free signal to make it work reliably, and that's 
especially true for AM where, ironically, there's more noise.  On FM, it 
works quite well with my tuner, but that's because I have a 9-element beam 
up on the roof.  If I didn't have that antenna, digital radio would hardly 
be worth considering because I'd have a hard time even with many local 
stations.  Let's face it, you can't get away from the noise unless the 
antenna is outside, and noise is the enemy here.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:18
Subject: Re: Fw: [NYDXA-List] FCC Approves IBOC Go Ahead


> From what I recall, from an older article in one of the hifi mags, =
> digital AM doesn't have nearly the range of a standard AM signal.  =
> Also,, I suspect the adjacent channel interference will mean that a =
> digital stream will need to be fairly strong to work.
>
> Steve, K8SP
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2