BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:55:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
I think I'll stick with satellite radio so long as the prices don't go way 
up after the merger. I haven't even used a walkman in so long I don't know 
if mine still works or even where it is for sure, nor the radio in my 
stereo. I've thought about taking my FM antenna down for my stereo actually, 
1 of those dipoles on the wall, but I made this one out of a bunch of parts 
that should never have worked. It did work great but when the day comes I 
take it down, that's it, I don't think it will ever go back up.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [NYDXA-List] FCC Approves IBOC Go Ahead


>I agree.  This is probably either a last ditch effort to revive AM or run 
>it
> off the air altogether.  Why pay for a digital receiver to listen to the
> same trash we could listen to free now?  No one is going to spend the 
> money
> for a digital receiver for AM unless it is included as part of a package.
> And if the NAB is so against paid radio, then let it do something about it
> instead of just running anti-satellite radio spots, or trying to ruin
> satellite services by getting a foothold into them to bring them down as 
> its
> corporate puppets did with commercial broadcasting.
> Harvey 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2