BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:00:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
I know my G5RV can't run on 160 at all unfortunately. I know people who made 
it work, but mine won't and I"m not adding to it because I need it like it 
is for 40. I'm going to put one up I have, I think it's like 220 feet or 
something, that will do it nicely.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: 160


> Hi Pat;
>
> I have a Carolina Windom.  Is their any way I could get it to work on =
> 160?
>
> They antenna is 130 FT. long however, the apex is about 50 FT. in the =
> air and it is just not long enough I'm afraid.
>
> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> [log in to unmask]
> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>
>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>  From: Pat Byrne=20
>  To: [log in to unmask]
>  Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 4:43 PM
>  Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] 160
>
>
>  A person can do a credible job with 100 watts and a short, well tuned=20
>  antenna.
>  When I worked 160 from Chicago I had never anything better than a=20
>  trapped dipole, 100 or so feet long, with a loading/tuning network at=20
>  the station end of the coax.  I suppose it was technically a top=20
>  loaded, thirty foot vertical, but who knows.  I also had a couple of=20
>  radials buried randomly under the antenna.  They couldn't have been=20
>  more than a hundred feet in total and they were connected to my=20
>  stations ground rod.
>  My best DX was San Francisco on CW at about 40 watts.  Made me pretty =
> proud!!
>  It's a great band.
>  Pat, K9JAUAt 03:05 PM 1/27/2007, you wrote:
>  >Folks, I regularly work the arrl 160 contest and will be in the cqww
>  >tonight.  My antennas are as follows:
>  >1. 120 foot physical length dipole with 20 feet of loading near each
>  >end, and a drooping tail at each end.
>  >Amounts to 180 feet of wire in the air.  This is at approximately 25 =
> feet.
>  >
>  >2. 90 foot half sloper fed against the 30 foot tower supporting the =
> feedpoint.
>  >
>  >Neither of these are anything near optimal, but in the cw contests,
>  >do reasonably well.
>  >
>  >Good luck to all participants..
>  >
>  >
>  >--
>  >No virus found in this outgoing message.
>  >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>  >Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/653 - Release Date:=20
>  >1/26/2007 11:11 AM
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2