BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
hank smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:13:24 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
why should they loose there license?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio


> but this idiot that invented this doesn't have any RF involved at all so
> it's not radio in the least and anyone who thinks it is needs to look at
> what radio is. Personally, I think anyone who would sign up or anything 
> with
> them should lose their license but that's JMO.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Christopher Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>
>
>> Buddy,
>> Since you signed up for the 90 day free trial, give us a report on how
>> it work and whether the transceiver software is accessible.  They said
>> there were some shortcut keys to help the visually impaired.
>>
>> The one nice thing about this product is you don't need to mess around
>> with your router ports as you do with echolink.  you can also make qso's
>> with cw.
>>
>> I think the purists might argue that anything that use voip is NOT ham
>> radio.
>>
>> 73 Chris w1gm
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2