BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:50:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
220 is a good band but no one uses it. It's a real shame.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: e-skip


> Well, I'm glad that 220 is getting some interest.  I never would have
> thought that was possible.  What drew up interest on 220?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Russ Kiehne wrote:
>
>> Yes, there's some activity.  One of the repeaters is linked to echolink.
>> There's a system on 220 called the condore connection.  It's a number of 
>> 220
>> repeaters linked together.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:08 AM
>> Subject: Re: e-skip
>>
>>
>> >I didn't think much of the 220 band, is it active in your area?  It sure
>> > isn't here, though we have some stuff on 220.  When I got the radio I
>> > didn't
>> > know what I was in for in terms of coverage and the fact that it had a
>> > whole
>> > other receiver!
>>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2