BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ham Steve <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:31:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Simon,

The legal definition of slander is stating something about someone that one 
knows is false.  Since you won't divulge your call, if you have one, nobody 
is committing slander because nobody is typing any knowingly false 
statements.  Check with a barrister and get your facts straight.  Until you 
do, get lost!

Steve, K8SP
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: icom radios


> lets get the facts strait now, nothing has been proved at all, so it is
> still  slander.
> the only pane, is you and all those who keep giving out the aggravation,
> either go pick on someone else, or better still, go find something else to
> do with your life.
>
> Simon
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:25 PM
> Subject: Re: icom radios
>
>
>>Their is no slander in truth.
>>Pain maybe, but truth has been proven beyond a doubt here.
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 9/19/2006
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2