Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:05:35 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 2/13/2007 10:36:27 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Todd Moody
> metabolic effects of our diet. I know that I was surprised to learn
> that Owsley "Bear" Stanley's FBG is 99 after 40+ years of a
> meat-only diet.
1) How relevant is FBG without knowing one's Fasting Insulin and HBA1C?
Also, despite the fact that many of us on this board believe that 99 is not ideal
-- it certainly is not considered diabetic or even pre-diabetic. I believe
Mr. Stanley made that point on another forum - that his FBG is neither diabetic
nor pre-diabetic. Also, perhaps the reference ranges should differ for
someone following such a unique diet.
2) Any thoughts on whether excessive calories could cause a rise in FBG?? I'm
not sure how one would determine what is "excessive" -- because caloric needs
vary from person to person for a variety of reasons. But I know that for
myself -- dairy products are a "trigger" food and it's easier for me to avoid
them than it is to eat small/reasonable portions. (My hubby will eat 1-2 oz and
be satisfied -- I on the other hand could eat 8 oz and still want more...
weird. Nuts are almost as bad for me...) So I am wondering if it's possible that
someone who is active and following a virtually zero carb diet such as Mr.
Stanley (only meat, eggs and dairy) -- could take in "excessive" calories in
terms of overall health yet remain slim. I guess I'm beginning to believe that
just because a person can eat tons of food and not get fat doesn't mean it's a
good idea. I've been experimenting with intermittant fasting and some calorie
restriction and am amazed at how much extra food I've shoveled in over the
decades just because of habit (ie it's noon, time to eat regardless of hunger; or
eating certain amounts just because I always have in the past regardless of
hunger cues) or boredom, to alleviate depression, as inappropriate reward and
because I could, without gaining weight -- not because of real need or hunger.
Maybe in terms of food, "less is more" as we age. Thoughts?
|
|
|