Saddam is being tried for the atrocities he perpetrated against the Kurds,
and Iranians, as well as murdering some of his own people. 

Bush lying about weapons of mass destruction or Clinton lying about his
affair; which  is worse?  I say bush's lies about wmd is worse because
after they found no wmd, he made up several other stories about why we are
there. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[log in to unmask]
Come visit my new store! http://www.cafepress.com/TamarMag
visit my Blog at; http://tamarmag-newsletters.blogspot.com/


> [Original Message]
> From: Anthony Arnold <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 3/24/2006 5:19:03 PM
> Subject: Re: FW: was dental question   now iraq war.
>
> I don't know what we're currently trying Hussein and his brother for, but
> they had no involvement in September 11th, so why are we over there
besides
> to take our frustration out on somebody.  But on the other hand, if I
would
> become the president tomorrow, I wouldn't pull out immediately as some
would
> like to see, I would personally like to fix what my country has done. 
It's
> like if I accidentally dropped a cigarette on somebody's carpet and it
burns
> a hole, I would feel oppogated to replace their carpet, no matter what.  
>
> Thanks, 
> Anthony 
> Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cerebral Palsy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kendall David Corbett
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 6:49 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: FW: was dental question now iraq war.
>
> Ken,
>
> Whether the Iraqis are better off is a tough call; they may (or may not,
> some would argue) have greater civil liberties, but their lives may be
> in greater immediate danger than they were under Hussein. =20
>
> On the opposite side of that coin, many would argue that we in the US
> are safer, but have had our civil liberties eroded.  It was said in the
> immediate post 9/11 period that the terrorists wanted to destroy the
> American (read US) way of life, and they have made a start toward that,
> IMHO.
>
> As I read UN Resolution 1441, it doesn't explicitly give member states
> of the UN permission to undertake unilateral military action against
> Iraq.  That does seem to be permissible under UN resolutions 678 and
> 687, which were signed in 1990 and 1991, respectively. =20
>
> My point is that the armed forces presently engaged as coalition
> partners do not wear UN uniforms, and as such are not formally
> recognized as UN forces.
>
> Kendall=20
>
> An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's redundant!)
>
> The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
> persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all
> progress depends on the unreasonable man.
>
> -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ken barber [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:54 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: FW: was dental question now iraq war.
>
>   actually resolution 1441 passed without desent, but,
> then when it got time to actually follow through, then
> the germans, french, and russians backpeddled and
> would not follow through. 1441 gave any member nation
> the right to enforce it. the u.s. and the brits with a
> few more did exactly that.=20
>   it appears that the intelligence worldwide was wrong
> on lagre amounts of weapons of mass destruction unless
> you believe that ranking iragi general that says they
> flew them to syria. the media is ignoring him. i'd
> guess some of you have heard nothing about him up to
> just this email. but, either way i'll ask the
> question. do you think iragis are better off now than
> before the invasion? your honest answer should pretty
> well tell you if the war is right or wrong. don't
> wealsel out, they are either better off without saddam
> or they were better off with him.=20
>
> --- Kendall David Corbett <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Let me send this again, so the link stays intact!
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kendall David Corbett
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:59 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: dental question
> >=20
> > Anthony,
> >=20
> > President Bush tried to get UN approval for the war
> > in Iraq, and was
> > turned down.  He then formed a coalition of partner
> > nations for the war,
> > which included the US, England, Australia, Canada,
> > and a few others that
> > I can't recall right now.
> >=20
> > This is a link to an article in the Washington Post
> > from August of 2002
> > that talks about members of the present President
> > Bush's administration
> > saying that the President didn't even need
> > Congressional approval for
> > the present Iraq war, since Congress had approved
> > the use of military
> > force in 1991 when Iraq invaded Kuwait, and the
> > Kuwaiti government made
> > a formal request for help.
> >=20
> >
> www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A61040-2002Aug25?language=3Dprinter
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Kendall=20
> >=20
> > An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's
> > redundant!)
> >=20
> > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the
> > unreasonable one
> > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
> > Therefore, all
> > progress depends on the unreasonable man.
> >=20
> > -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
> >=20
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anthony Arnold
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:29 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: dental question
> >=20
> > I know I should have paid more attention back in
> > school when we were
> > covering this, but does the President of the United
> > States have to win
> > approval from the UN before going into places like
> > Iraq or Iran?  Does
> > he
> > only need congress's? =20
> >=20
> > Thanks,=20
> > Anthony=20
> > Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cerebral Palsy List
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> > Of
> > ken barber
> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:35 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: dental question
> >=20
> > you guys would never admit it, but, you know i have
> > a
> > point. someone can pass gass in a room full of
> > democrats and bush will be blamed for the stench.=20
> >=20
> > --- Mike Collis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >=20
> > > Now, now, Ken!!! Don't get testy.  LOL  You're our
> > > favorite curmudgeon!!!=20
> > >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Cerebral Palsy List
> > > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > > ken barber
> > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 12:56 AM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: dental question
> > >=20
> > > george dubya bush. and it is his fault that you
> > did
> > > not know that too.=20
> > >=20
> > > --- Anthony Arnold <[log in to unmask]>
> > > wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > May I ask you who's dubya?
> > > >=20
> > > > Thanks,=20
> > > > Anthony=20
> > > > Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
> > >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around=20
> > http://mail.yahoo.com=20
> >=20
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20
> http://mail.yahoo.com=20