Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:14:50 -0600 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
512 minus 64 for onboard video maybe?
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, T Behler wrote:
> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:13:28 -0500
> From: T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: question on RAM
>
> John and all:
>
> Ok, now I got it.
>
> I got my RAM info via "my computer" just like John suggested. I just had to
> re-set my JAWS cursor, and it was fine.
>
> Now to the next question:
>
> I have 448 MB of RAM in this computer.
>
> Is that going to be enough for the new Jaws 8.0, or am I heading for a
> problem here?
>
> I also never heard of 448 MB of RAM; I thought it usually went in blocks
> from 128, to 256, and then up to 512.
>
> You learn something new every day.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 3:33 PM
> Subject: Re: question on RAM
>
>
>> that's how I do it, in the system properties, just use the jaws curser, it
>> will read version of windows, and as you go down, who it's registered to,
>> and then the CPU speed followed by the RAM. Processor speed and RAM are on
>> the same line. On mine anyway.
>>
>
|
|
|