Mr Drammeh,
   
  Thanks for sharing with us Mugabe's speech at the UN General Assembly. Coincidentally happen to share his views on the history of Western colonialism in Africa and their on-going neo-colonialist and imperialist pursuits throughout the globe. 
   
  What I however find objectionable from African leaders like Mugabe is their crude, subjugative and blackmail style of reasoning that their fellow Africans be either for them or are otherwise for the West. Their is a third way which they fail to acknowledge.  Any form of political opposition to their regimes is as such written off as an association of traitors and agents of the 'evil West'. Consequently, such leaders believe that they have licences and warrants for their regimes to unleash terror and punishments on opposition sympathisers. Let's consider thiis: What justification does the Mugabe government have to demolish solid and legally-built legal homes in areas populated predominantly by opposition supporters on the flimsy basis that the building permits that they acquired from the Government itself was flawed. Seeing is believing! When I saw the sacrilege being committed by Mugabe's henchmen on his orders , I could hardly believe the cold hearltlessness of his
 regime. Within hours, thousands of middle class Zimbabwean supporters of the MDC opposition were left homeless and destitute. 
  Papa Mugabe has definitely overstayed his usefulness to Zimbabweans, he should therefore retire and stop feigning that without him Zimbabwe would be over-runned by a marauding tribe of White Barbarians with Gordon Brown and George Killer Bush leading them.
   
  Ramadan mubarak!
   
  Bailo
   
  . 
   
  OMAR DRAMMEH <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
  Folks,

Hear it from the man himself. It can't be more explicit than this. Enjoy.

regards
Omar

Your Excellency, President of the 62ndSession of the United Nations General Assembly, 
Mr. Srgjan Kerim, 
Your Majesties,
Your Excellencies, Heads of State and Government,
Your Excellency the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Mr. Ban Ki-Moon,
Distinguished Delegates,
Ladies and Gentlemen. 

Mr. President,
Allow me to congratulate you on your election to preside over this august assembly. We are confident that through your stewardship, issues on this 62nd Session agenda be dealt with in a balanced manner and to the satisfaction of all.
Let me also pay tribute to your predecessor, Madame Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa, who steered the work of the 61st Session in a very competent and impartial manner.
Her ability to identify the crucial issues facing the world today will be remembered as the hallmark of her presidency.

Mr. President,
We extend our hearty welcome to the new Secretary-General, Mr. Ban Ki-Moon, who has taken up this challenging job requiting dynamism in confronting the global challenges of the 21st Century. Balancing global interests and steering the United Nations in a direction that gives hope to the multitudes of the poor, the sick, the hungry and the marginalized, is indeed a mammoth task. We would like to assure him that Zimbabwe will continue to support an open, transparent and all-inclusive multilateral approach in dealing with these global challenges.

Mr. President,
Climate change is one of the most pressing global issues of our time. Its negative impact is greatest in developing countries, particularly those on the African continent. We believe that if the international community is going to seriously address the challenges of climate change, then we need to get our priorities right. In Zimbabwe, the effects of climate change have become more evident in the past decade as we have witnessed increased and recurrent droughts as well as occasional floods, leading to enormous humanitarian challenges.

Mr. President,
We are for a United Nations that recognises the equality of sovereign nations and peoples whether big or small. We are averse to a body in which the economically and militarily powerful behave like bullies, trampling on the rights of weak and smaller states as sadly happened in Iraq. In the light of these inauspicious developments, this Organisation must surely examine the essence of its authority and the extent of its power when challenged in this manner. 
Such challenges to the authority of the UN and its Charter underpin our repeated call for the revitalisation of the United Nations General Assembly, itself the most representative organ of the UN. The General Assembly should be more active in all areas including those of peace and security. The encroachment of some U.N. organs upon the work of the General Assembly is of great concern to us. Thus any process of revitalizing or strengthening of the General Assembly should necessarily avoid eroding the principle of the accountability of all principal and subsidiary organs to the General Assembly.

Mr. President,
Once again we reiterate our position that the Security Council as presently constituted is not democratic. In its present configuration, the Council has shown that it is not in a position to protect the weaker states who find themselves at loggerheads with a marauding super-power. Most importantly, justice demands that any Security Council reform redresses the fact that Africa is the only continent without a permanent seat and veto power in the Security Council. Africa's demands are known and enunciated in the Ezulwini consensus.

Mr. President,
We further call for the U.N. system to refrain from interfering in matters that are clearly the domain of member states and are not a threat to international peace and security. Development at country level should continue to be country-led, and not subject to the whims of powerful donor states.

Mr President,
Zimbabwe won its independence on 18th April, 1980, after a protracted war against British colonial imperialism which denied us human rights and democracy. That colonial system which suppressed and oppressed us enjoyed the support of many countries of the West who were signatories to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Even after 1945, it would appear that the Berlin Conference of 1884, through which Africa was parcelled to colonial European powers, remained stronger than the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is therefore clear that for the West, vested economic interests, racial and ethnocentric considerations proved stronger than their adherence to principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The West still negates our sovereignties by way of control of our resources, in the process making us mere chattels in out own lands, mere minders of its trans-national interests. In my own country and other sister states in Southern Africa, the most visible form of this control has been over land despoiled from us at the onset of British colonialism.
That control largely persists, although it stands firmly challenged in Zimbabwe, thereby triggering the current stand-off between us and Britain, supported by her cousin states, most notably the United States and Australia. Mr Bush, Mr. Blair and now Mr Brown's sense of human rights precludes our people's right to their God-given resources, which in their view must be controlled by their kith and kin. I am termed dictator because I have rejected this supremacist view and frustrated the neo-colonialists.

Mr President,
Clearly the history of the struggle for out own national and people's rights is unknown to the president of the United States of America. He thinks the Declaration of Human Rights starts with his last term in office! He thinks she can introduce to us, who bore the brunt of fighting for the freedoms of our peoples, the virtues of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. What rank hypocrisy! 

Mr President,
I lost eleven precious years of my life in the jail of a white man whose freedom and well- being I have assured from the first day of Zimbabwe's Independence. I lost a further fifteen years fighting white injustice in my country. 
Ian Smith is responsible for the death of well over 50 000 of my people. I bear scars of his tyranny which Britain and America condoned. I meet his victims everyday. Yet he walks free. He farms free. He talks freely, associates freely under a black Government. We taught him democracy. We gave him back his humanity.
He would have faced a different fate here and in Europe if the 50 000 he killed were Europeans. Africa has not called for a Nuremberg trial against the white world which committed heinous crimes against its own humanity. It has not hunted perpetrators of this genocide, many of whom live to this day, nor has it got reparations from those who offended against it. Instead it is Africa which is in the dock, facing trial from the same world that persecuted it for centuries.
Let Mr. Bush read history correctly. Let him realise that both personally and in his representative capacity as the current President of the United States, he stands for this "civilisation" which occupied, which colonised, which incarcerated, which killed. He has much to atone for and very little to lecture us on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. His hands drip with innocent blood of many nationalities.
He still kills.
He kills in Iraq. He kills in Afghanistan. And this is supposed to be out master on human rights?
He imprisons.
He imprisons and tortures at Guantanamo. He imprisoned and tortured at Abu Ghraib. He has secret torture chambers in Europe. Yes, he imprisons even here in the United States, with his jails carrying more blacks than his universities can ever enroll. He even suspends the provisions of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Take Guantanamo for example; at that concentration camp international law does not apply. The national laws of the people there do not apply. Laws of the United States of America do not apply. Only Bush's law applies. Can the international community accept being lectured by this man on the provisions of the universal declaration of human rights? Definitely not!
Mr President, We are alarmed that under his leadership, basic rights of his own people and those of the rest of the world have summarily been rolled back. America is primarily responsible for rewriting core tenets of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We seem all guilty for 9/11. Mr. Bush thinks he stands above all structures of governance, whether national or international.
At home, he apparently does not need the Congress. Abroad, he does not need the UN, international law and opinion. This forum did not sanction Blair and Bush's misadventures in Iraq. The two rode roughshod over the UN and international opinion. Almighty Bush is now corning back to the UN for a rescue package because his nose is bloodied! Yet he dares lecture us on tyranny. Indeed, he wants us to pray him! We say No to him and encourage him to get out of Iraq. Indeed he should mend his ways before he clambers up the pulpit to deliver pieties of democracy.

Mr President,
The British and the Americans have gone on a relentless campaign of destabilising and vilifying my country. They have sponsored surrogate forces to challenge lawful authority in my country. They seek regime change, placing themselves in the role of the Zimbabwean people in whose collective will democracy places the right to define and change regimes.
Let these sinister governments be told here and now that Zimbabwe will not allow a regime change authored by outsiders. We do not interfere with their own systems in America and Britain. Mr Bush and Mr Brown have no role to play in our national affairs. They are outsiders and mischievous outsiders and should therefore keep out! The colonial sun set a long time ago; in 1980in the case of Zimbabwe, and hence Zimbabwe will never be a colony again. Never!
We do not deserve sanctions. We are Zimbabweans and we know how to deal with our problems. We have done so in the past, well before Bush and Brown were known politically. We have our own regional and continental organizations and communities.
In that vein, I wish to express my country's gratitude to President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa who, on behalf of SADC, successfully facilitated the dialogue between the Ruling Party and the Opposition Parties, which yielded the agreement that has now resulted in the constitutional provisions being finally adopted. Consequently, we will be holding multiple democratic elections in March 2008. Indeed we have always had timeous general and presidential elections since our independence.

Mr. President,
In conclusion, let me stress once more that the strength of the United Nations lies in its universality and impartiality as it implements its mandate to promote peace and security, economic and social development, human rights and international law as outlined in the Charter. Zimbabwe stands ready to play its part in all efforts and programmes aimed at achieving these noble goals.
I thank you. 



> From: Kabir Njaay [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 2007-09-27 13:40:48 CEST
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Fwd: 'We Sink Or Swim Together'
> 
> 'We Sink Or Swim Together' 
> 
> 
> The Herald (Harare)
> 
> 
> OPINION
> 27 September 2007 
> Posted to the web 27 September 2007 
> 
> By Mabasa Sasa
> Harare 
> 
> IT seems the whole of Africa has been rallying around Zimbabwe of late, never mind UK Premier Gordon Brown petulantly pouting: "If President Robert Mugabe is at the EU-Africa Summit I will not go!" 
> 
> Zambian Information Minister Mike Mulongoti has said: "It would be pointless for President (Levy) Mwanawasa and others (African leaders) to go there because then there is no need if people are not willing to dialogue with others." 
> 
> 
> It must be noted that President Mwanawasa is the current chair of the regional grouping, Sadc. Ghana's Foreign Affairs Minister, Akwasi Osei Adjei, has warned that Zimbabwe should be in attendance, to hell with what Gordon Brown thinks. In his own words: "I believe we are coming with all the members of the African Union, the heads of state of the African Union. So, definitely the invitation will be issued (to President Mugabe)." It must also be noted, significantly, that Ghana's President John Kuffour is presently heading the African Union. 
> 
> Mozambique's Foreign Affairs Minister, Alcide Abreu, has said Maputo will go by Sadc's and the AU's position. Former Mozambican head of state Joaquim Chissano expressed the view that: "Any government is free to take a stance which it deems fit to defend its interests. In this case, it's necessary to find out if it is in the interest of the larger group to which she (Britain) belongs, which is the EU." 
> 
> Leefa Martin, Sadc's spokeswoman, has put it thus: "Attempting to isolate His Excellency President Robert Mugabe would be contrary to the letter and spirit of that initiative and, thus, the Sadc position is that of non-participation if one of the region's leaders, namely President Robert Mugabe, is not invited." 
> 
> Even "strange characters with strange ideas" like Don McKinnon have jumped onto the bandwagon. 
> 
> McKinnon, who engineered Zimbabwe's suspension from the Commonwealth leading to Harare pulling out of the grouping of former British colonies, has "advised" the EU that President Mugabe is a hero and Zimbabwe should be invited to the December Summit being hosted by Portugal. 
> 
> While McKinnon's utterances come as something of a surprise, the position of the African continent at large and that of Sadc in particular on Zimbabwe's participation at the summit is, though some in the West may find it hard to believe, only to be expected. 
> 
> The latest stand by Sadc to stare down British intimidation points to a resurrection of the spirit that gelled the region in years gone by and has echoes of the unity that characterised the Frontline States. If understood in the context of the Frontline States, the region's support of Zimbabwe in the face of brute intimidation from those opposed to the Government in Harare becomes easy to understand. 
> 
> Between 1975 and 1980, Tanzania, Mozambique, Angola, Zambia and Botswana teamed up to aid Zimbabwe and South Africa's liberation from colonial and apartheid regimes and the price they paid for this solidarity was quite dear indeed. There were acts of aggression, sabotage and destabilisation aimed at these five countries by the South African racist regime. 
> 
> Rebel movements were funded to fan civil wars and there were military raids by the forces of regression into the Frontline States. Mozambique, and indeed the entire region, suffered a major blow, when apartheid South Africa saw to the assassination of Samora Machel in 1986. 
> 
> The apartheid regime slapped sanctions on the Frontline States, resulting in huge economic losses as trade routes became distorted. 
> 
> Furthermore, billions of dollars had to be spent on defence rather than on much-needed social services, health and education as the Frontline States had to protect themselves from an apartheid regime intent on reversing the gains of the liberation struggle in the region. According to some estimates, over two million people died while another seven million were displaced in the Frontline States because of South Africa's opposition to democracy. A 1989 Commonwealth report says the Frontline States lost around US$45 billion in 10 years - "almost three times their combined foreign debt at the time". A former Zambian home affairs minister, Aaron Milner, is on record as saying his country's economic under-performance could be directly linked to the anti-apartheid struggle. 
> 
> "We had to divert our resources to finance the different liberation movements including the ANC," he said, adding: "The sacrifice was worth it." 
> 
> In the 21st century, Tanzania, alongside Zimbabwe, has largely been at the forefront of the revival and perpetuation of the spirit of resistance that has made Southern Africa what it is today. This is hardly surprising considering the role Mwalimu Julius Nyerere played in the liberation of not only the region, but in Africa as a whole. A Tanzanian who was pivotal in the fight against racist minority rule is Brigadier-General Hashim Mbita, a man many Zimbabweans will remember as the charismatic ambassador to this country not so long ago. 
> 
> His major contribution to African independence came when he was executive secretary of the Liberation Committee of the Organisation of African Unity (now AU) from 1974 up to the time South Africa became free in 1994. 
> 
> Brig-Gen Mbita outlined the history of the Frontline States in three stages: "First as victims, second as defiant people and third as victors. The stages that this process went through covered agitation, political organisation and eventually physical confrontation. "The birth of the Frontline States as a dependable rear base and victory which saw the establishment of Sadc as an organ for economic transformation and consolidation of the regional security, peace and defence must be carefully examined." 
> 
> If Sadc today is a child of the Frontline States it becomes obvious that the regional organisation is bound to stand by Zimbabwe against the machinations of the same people responsible for the colonisation and underdevelopment of Africa. 
> 
> Speaking at the 2005 Sadc Summit, former Tanzanian president Benjamin Mkapa rallied the region around the spirit that inspired the successes of the Frontline States. "Together we shared, together we endured and together we brought to triumph to the liberation struggle. The spirit of the Frontline States should invigorate us into action - action that would see Sadc emerge as the most purposeful, most powerful and most regional economic grouping in our lifetime," he said. "The solidarity forged in the heat of struggle can, today, if properly harnessed, help us forge regional integration at a greater pace . . . let the Sadc Summit be the fire around which people in this region sit - in unity, solidarity and enthusiasm - to chart a path of survival and prosperity through the jungle of a globalising world." 
> 
> South African President Thabo Mbeki answered this call thus: "The 'spirit of the Frontline States' to which President Mkapa referred means that as members of Sadc we must be ready and willing to work closely together, understanding that we share a common destiny. 
> 
> "It means that all of us must understand that what we do in any one of our countries has an impact on the rest. It means that as countries, we will sink or swim together." 
> 
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
> 
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> 

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


       
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤