BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:47:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
He's not in the US, good thing for him. Something tells me, he's have an 
astronomical fine by now if he really uses half of what he's looking for, 
assuming he gets it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: icom radios


> Well, if you're not using them on ham channels, they're not legal
> anyhow.  Not thype excepted.  Too bad.  Try again, and read up on fcc
> regs.
> 73s
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, goshawk wrote:
>
>> as I am not planning on using them on ham channels, you do not need my 
>> call.
>> I am interested.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:25 AM
>> Subject: icom radios
>>
>>
>>> Simon, I can get two models of the i-com radios you are looking for.
>>> Please send me your call with varification information.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/449 - Release Date: 
>>> 9/15/2006
>>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2