Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:39:13 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Butch, you're wrong, there.
TV is supported by BOTH commercials AND a monthly fee. That is, unless you
watch public TV, where they hold your program hostage until you and some
other folks pay up. I think the way it is supposed to work here in
America, for the privilege of living in the land of opportunity, you will
pay any and every way you can.
Of course, there are a few of us that have already judged TV to have mostly
trash for content, and therefore, we will not pay the media giants for any
more of their garbage. They still haven't found a way to make us take TV
if we decide it isn't worth it. Radio around here has become so poor that
I've been building up my own music collection and have mostly stopped
listening to commercial radio except during morning drive time, and then,
only one station, instead of the dozen or so that I used to listen to over
the course of a week.
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 08:14 AM 4/5/2007 -0700, you wrote:
>There sure isn't much on a m worth listening to these days. Who cares if
>art bell is digital or not? I'm getting a little tired of the "it is
>digital, so it has got to be better" idea. I think the plan is for free
>radio to go away. The first thing they have to do to make it a pay
>service is convert folks to digital. Radio is going the way of
>television, no longer commercial supported.
>73s
>Butch Bussen
>wa0vjr
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/748 - Release Date: 4/5/2007
>3:33 PM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
|
|
|