Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:19:55 -0500 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Anthony and the group. I am back on the list after being away from
mail for a week, but if you are considering the 96 it is very user
friendly for someone who is blind. I haven't checked out the software
with JAWS 8, but I will try and do that later on this week. More later.
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Anthony Vece wrote:
> Maybe I'll get one.
>
> But, it will have to be well after Christmas.
>
> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> [log in to unmask]
> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kenneth Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 1:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] RS PRO-96 scanner was RE: New to the list.
>
>
> > Yes, the PRO-97 is a later model. -Ken
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne
> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:56 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: RS PRO-96 scanner was RE: New to the list.
> >
> >
> > I don't know.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 9:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: RS PRO-96 scanner was RE: New to the list.
> >
> >
> >> So then the PRO 97 is a later model?
> >>
> >
>
|
|
|