BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
hank smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
hank smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:12:46 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (169 lines)
why would it deminish?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 8:05 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Fw: [WestMichiganHams] FCC Eliminates Morse Code 
Requirement (Finally!!)


> Hi.
>
> I'll make a bet with you guys that the decline in amateur radio 
> actually=20
> will accelerate now, rather than decelerate.
> --Lou K2LKK
>
>
> At 10:35 PM 12/15/2006 -0500, you wrote:
>>Hi, all.
>>
>>Well, when it rains, it pours, I guess.
>>
>>Here's the latest ruling by the FCC concerning the long-awaited decision 
>>on
>>the CW requirement, and other issues.
>>
>>Many of  you know how I feel, so I won't go into it any more. ... I'll 
>>just
>>go to bed tonight, and maybe try to make some CW contacts tomorrow on the
>>reduced CW operating frequencies we now have on HF.
>>
>>73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ, Big Rapids, MI
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Mark Thompson" <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: <[log in to unmask]>; "Scan Illinois"
>><[log in to unmask]>; "Chicago Scanning Club"
>><[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>;
>><[log in to unmask]>;
>><[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>;
>><[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>;
>><[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>
>>Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:27 PM
>>Subject: [WestMichiganHams] FCC Eliminates Morse Code Requirement
>>(Finally!!)
>>
>>
>>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:   NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:
>>December 15, 2006 Chelsea Fallon:  (202) 418-7991
>>
>>FCC MODIFIES AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE RULES,
>>ELIMINATING MORSE CODE EXAM REQUIREMENTS AND
>>ADDRESSING ARRL PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
>>
>>Washington, D.C. =AD Today, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
>>adopted a Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration (Order) that
>>modifies the rules for the Amateur Radio Service by revising the=
> examination
>>requirements for obtaining a General Class or Amateur Extra Class amateur
>>radio operator license and revising the operating privileges for 
>>Technician
>>Class licensees.  In addition, the Order resolves a petition filed by the
>>American Radio Relay League, Inc. (ARRL) for partial reconsideration of an
>>FCC Order on amateur service rules released on October 10, 2006.
>>
>>The current amateur service operator license structure contains three
>>classes of amateur radio operator licenses:  Technician Class, General
>>Class, and Amateur Extra Class.  General Class and Amateur Extra Class
>>licensees are permitted to operate in Amateur bands below 30 MHz, while 
>>the
>>introductory Technician Class licensees are only permitted to operate in
>>bands above 30 MHz.  Prior to today=92s action, the FCC, in accordance 
>>with
>>international radio regulations, required applicants for General Class and
>>Amateur Extra Class operator licenses to pass a five words-per-minute 
>>Morse
>>code examination.
>>
>>Today=92s Order eliminates that requirement for General and Amateur Extra
>>licensees.  This change reflects revisions to international radio
>>regulations made at the International Telecommunication Union=92s 2003=
> World
>>Radio Conference (WRC-03), which authorized each country to determine
>>whether to require that individuals demonstrate Morse code proficiency in
>>order to qualify for an amateur radio license with transmitting privileges
>>on frequencies below 30 MHz.  This change eliminates an unnecessary
>>regulatory burden that may discourage current amateur radio operators from
>>advancing their skills and participating more fully in the benefits of
>>amateur radio.
>>
>>Today=92s Order also revises the operating privileges for Technician Class
>>licensees by eliminating a disparity in the operating privileges for the
>>Technician Class and Technician Plus Class licensees.  Technician Class
>>licensees are authorized operating privileges on all amateur frequencies
>>above 30 MHz.  The Technician Plus Class license, which is an operator
>>license class that existed prior the FCC=92s simplification of the amateur
>>license structure in 1999 and was grandfathered after that time, 
>>authorized
>>operating privileges on all amateur frequencies above 30 MHz, as well as
>>frequency segments in four HF bands (below 30 MHz) after the successful
>>completion of a Morse code examination.  With today=92s elimination of the
>>Morse code exam requirements, the FCC concluded that the disparity between
>>the operating privileges of Technician Class licensees and Technician Plus
>>Class licensees should not be retained.  Therefore, the FCC, in today=92s
>>action, afforded Technician and Technician Plus licensees identical
>>operating privileges.
>>
>>Finally, today=92s Order resolved a petition filed by the ARRL for partial
>>reconsideration of an FCC Order released on October 10, 2006 (FCC 06-149).
>>In this Order, the FCC authorized amateur stations to transmit voice
>>communications on additional frequencies in certain amateur service bands,
>>including the 75 meter (m) band, which is authorized only for certain
>>wideband voice and image communications.  The ARRL argued that the 75 m=
> band
>>should not have been expanded below 3635 kHz, in order to protect
>>automatically controlled digital stations operating in the 3620-3635 kHz
>>portion of the 80 m band.  The FCC concluded that these stations can be
>>protected by providing alternate spectrum in the 3585-3600 kHz frequency
>>segment.
>>
>>Action by the Commission on December 15, 2006, by Report and Order and=
> Order
>>on Reconsideration.  Chairman Martin and Commissioners Copps, Adelstein,
>>Tate, and McDowell.
>>
>>For additional information, contact William Cross at (202) 418-0691 or
>>[log in to unmask]
>>WT Docket Nos. 04-140 and 05-235.
>>=AD FCC =AD
>>
>>News and other information about the Federal Communications Commission
>>is available at www.fcc.gov.
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>><*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WestMichiganHams/
>>
>><*> Your email settings:
>>     Individual Email | Traditional
>>
>><*> To change settings online go to:
>>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WestMichiganHams/join
>>     (Yahoo! ID required)
>>
>><*> To change settings via email:
>>     mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>     mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>
>><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>     [log in to unmask]
>>
>><*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>>     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753=20 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2