Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:24:19 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have to wonder the same thing now. I don't think that used to be so much
the case, but I do wonder if that's the case now. I know some of the
programs I use I need jaws 6.2 or older because newer versions won't read
the menus. Since most of that is ham radio related though, I just run 6.2 on
the radio desk computer and leave it at that. Unfortunately, I'm one that
likes to have the latest and greatest of everything, but I'm finding more
and more lately, the latest isn't the greatest anymore.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 11:35 AM
Subject: off topic jfw 8.0
> Hi;
> I am still using 6.? at home. I have 7.1 at work and found that for some
> of
> their strange programs had to fall back to 6.0
> With the price of updates I've become skeptical of updating for the sake
> of
> updating. Unfortunately, if the thing gets to old it becomes worthless
> but
> I haven't seen much that makes me jump up and down and want to buy.
> I have both window eyes and jaws and at some time or other updating both
> will become just to expensive. Window eyes officially makes you buy all
> the
> updates from what you currently have to the one you want but they
> intentionally or unintentionally forgot when I was updating to 5.0
> One can't help but wonder if some updates come out just to use up the sma
> faster. I know, I'm a skeptic not only with jfw but with adaptive
> companies
> in general.
> Rich
>
|
|
|