BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:22:45 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
I had a chance to play with one of those the other day....nice rig...a bit
large, but not bad...this particular one didn't have a voice chip installed
though...but the user friendliness of the rig appealed to me...much more so
then the IC756PRO's they have at the same club location.
good receiver in it as well...it was out doing a 756 that was using a 3
element beam, the 940 was using just a dipole.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: ham radio deluxe


> I actually miss my old TS-940, it did a lot but no menus and was the best
> sounding radio I've had too. It's old technology, but if I could find
> another one in good shape, when I have the money, I'd probably get it
though
> I really don't have the room here anymore.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 10:20 PM
> Subject: Re: ham radio deluxe
>
>
> > Hi Phil.
> >
> > I think the only things that makes today's radios too complex is that
they
> > try to make one radio serve too many purposes, and they try too hard to
> > minimize the number of radio controls by putting most things on menus.
My
> > old Kenwood TS130S had just about the right balance between performance
> > and
> > complexity.  Didn't have to get the book out very often for that radio!
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> >
> >
> > At 08:01 PM 6/19/2006 -0600, you wrote:
> >>I am getting to old to buy any more radioes that you have to go to night
> >>school to learn how to operate.  Give me the HT37 any day.  In fact, if
> >>you
> >>have one, I'll give you 25 bucks for it if you pay the shipping to
Denver,
> >>grin.  Toss in the HQ180X and I might even up it to 50 dollars but you
> >>still
> >>have to pay the shipping.  It took me three months to learn how to
program
> >>my Kenwood V7A and then I went for several months without the need to
> >>change
> >>anything until our repeater club droped a 100 Hz sub tone on the input
and
> >>I
> >>had to get out the manual and figure everything out all over again.  My
> >>old
> >>Drake TR22 I first got for 2 meters is starting to sound pretty simple
> >>compared to all this stuff you guys are doing now.  When I had my
FT757GX
> >>with the software up and running, I must admit, all them memory
channels,
> >>dual V F Oes, automatic antenna tuning, and all those extra features
were
> >>pretty cool.  No more labeling crystals in Braille either.
> >>
> >>Phil.
> >>K0NX
> >>
> >>The Zenith Tube Website
> >>www.RedWhiteAndBlue.org
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
> >
> >
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2