 
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:04:21 -0400 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't have this list setup with it's own folder yet, but that's because I
have so many folders for so many other things already. It may be coming
though, some times I'd just rather go down the list hitting the delete on
the messages who's subjects I don't like and then go back and read
everything after.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: Off topic or off list
>I usually keep my list view for Outlook set to "sort by conversational
> topic", this way if I am not interested in a thread I can delete all the
> messages in one stroke. And of course all the messages for this list go
> into their own folder, and each folder can have it's own view settings.
> 73, Ken -N5SWR
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Harvey
> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 4:43 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Off topic or off list
>
>
> I agree with John. I have gotten a lot of help on this list, and while we
> do vary off topic sometimes, it is worth it. If you don't like it, may I
> echo John's words, "goodbye.
> Harvey
>
|
|
|
