BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:39:05 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Speaking of XM, has anyone used the Eton E1/XM?  This receiver receives, am, 
fm shortwave and XM.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: e-skip


>I have heard Serious is doing better  then XM anyway and has m more
> choice.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, John Miller wrote:
>
>> Mine is pretty close to walkman. I have a home unit too which I use more 
>> but
>> they say I can leave my portable on the home stand a lot and only take it
>> out when I use it if I want with out hurting the battery so I might get 
>> rid
>> of the home one and start doing that. On vacation the portable is all 
>> I'll
>> have anyway, it sure did a good job for me last year. I like XM, I sure 
>> hate
>> to have to switch but with NASCAR coverage doing to Sirius, I'll have to.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: e-skip
>>
>>
>> > Serious will have to get a good portable to have as much competition as
>> > XM.  A friend of mine even said that  XM has even a walkman model or 
>> > will
>> > soon.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2