Stefan:

>Well yes. So far I know only one little boy whom I see frequently.
>After three years where mainly the mother cared for him he became a
>terrible demanding child which always expected every wish of him to
>fulfill. He couldn't tolerate if something went in another direction.
>Shortly after the father engaged more, this ugly phenomen was gone.
>Healthwise he seems to do very well - no doctor seen up to now. And
>he now is around 3.5 years old.

Jaloa (2.5 and speaking some non-english language) lays a "rasberry"
on me
whenever she doesn't like what I have to say. I think she picked it up
from
"All in the Family" reruns on Nick-at-night. Though I suspect this may
not
be understandable to a European. ;)

>>It may comfort you to know that if I do run into any health problems I
>>would return to instincto as a matter of course--kind of the first thing
>to
>>try, eh?
>
>Yes, if something went wrong I first would let go little enhance-
>ments of my own, like eating three proteins in the evening. Just retur-
>ning to the roots.

Three proteins? Sounds fun. Details? ;)

>>Previously, I was, for some reason, interested in being as "pure"
>>as possible--presently, I am more interested in seeing what I can get away
>>with.;)
>
>Being pure has never been my interest, but being healthy was and is!

Very similar methinks.

>>Life is grand. I wish I could have several lifetimes!
>
>Man, you have! Read "conversations with god" by Neale D. Walsch. It's
>all explained there.

I will hopefully sprout some mushrooms on me when I die, regardless of
how
attractive it might be to my ego to think otherwise. ;) But I'm
talking out
of school since I haven't read your recommended book. :/

>>And also to make up for my own
>>overboard "instincto is everything" message in the past.
>
>Come up, the past is the past. You are living here and now. No compen-
>sation necessary.

OK. Then I'll just do it for fun. ;)

>>Further, I find that much of my historic
>>overenthusiasm for instincto was subject to a simple mechanism: I would
>>feel less alienated (and distrustful of the world) if I could get other
>>people to 1] see how great it is and do it, and 2] see how cool I
>>supposedly was for doing it.
>
>Ah well, here come again the social reasons. There was a time when I
>felt alienated to the cooked world. This is over. I just feel being a
>part of this big game and if others eat in another way it's just their
>way of living. It's not my way any longer but maybe for them it's
>helpful.

You're simply a mutant. ;)

>>jean-claude appears to hate the world in many
>>ways--kind of the fruitarian rap only worse because he feels so superior
>to
>>it.
>
>We are having different impressions here.

Fair enough.

>>he is simply prostelytising for instincto--regardless that he
>>continues to have his old health problems and apparently some new ones as
>>well. But on and on the triumphant talk marches on several lists.
>
>Hm, let's approach this again from the practical side like I always do:
>Have you got any hints for him to get rid of his remaining ailments?

He should live in an alternate Walsh universe. ;)

>>Calling his bluff doesn't work--apparently he has a pretty air-tight
>>defense built up with all his ideas.
>
>The instincto idea has its air-tight defense ready, I have to admit.
>If it can't be blamed to buying bad commercial quality or not obeying
>to the food combination rules, it finally is attributed to your ancestors
>with their terribly unhealthy living style which let them degenerate.
>Well, degeneration is a fact (pottengers cats) but to blame everything
>to the above three reasons is obviously too much.

Pottinger's Cats may not be much of a fact, but I hear you.

>>So, how about it, Stefan. How about some Euro-gossip on the instinctos you
>>run with and/or have heard about. Good, bad, ugly. Let's hear some new
>>stuff. ;)
>
>I will try my best.

I am waiting with baited breath. ;)

Cheers,
Kirt

Secola  /\  Nieft
[log in to unmask]