BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:21:12 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hi all, I have been reading this thread for a long time and thought I would
make a few comments.  I think that people who are taking examinations for
amateur radio should have the option of taking the Morse Code test if they
choose to use that mode of communication.  There are a lot of operators out
there who like using CW and they should be able to have contact with new
amateurs.  One thing I was wondering:
What's going to happen to the HF bands now that the CW test is not required?
Does that mean that the bands will be overcrowded with voice communications?
Thanks again.

Eric
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Fowle" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: fcc report and order


> Dropping the code for extra class is a sad day for us.  Biased opinion!
>
> I can hit 80-10 with pretty poor antennas and 100 Watts from near San
Francisco
> time/freq suggestions for a good C.W. qso will be seriously considered.
<GRIN>
>
> Tom WA6IVG
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2