BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:46:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Hi Walt;

The internet cannot offer the personality that radio can inject.

Also, radio does not lend itself to urban legends without acknowledging 
there credibility.

In short, radio to me is still the most trust worthy medium we have and will 
ever have.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 4:54 AM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] Clear channel


>> Not only that, but radio is the least efficient medium to gain correct 
>> and
>> desired information.
>
> Nonsense. With the wasted time you spend on the Internet, you can't claim
> that radio is inefficient. It may not be giving you the _full_ picture, 
> but
> neither does the Internet and just as with the blowhard talking heads like
> Limbaugh and his ilk, any damned fool can make up anything they want, 
> stick
> it on the net, and there are a million fools lacking b.s. filters who will
> believe him. With radio, you get all of the vocal cues that go along with
> making or damaging credibility and you don't get that via the Internet.
> Anyone who can't find a range of opinions and viewpoints on the radio 
> today
> isn't looking very hard or is just plain lazy.
>
> --
> Walt Smith - Clearwater, FL
> [log in to unmask]
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2