BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Louis Kim Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:56:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (132 lines)
Hi John.

It might help a bit if I knew specifically what you are seeing.  What I 
have noticed is that the way that JAWS 7.1 handles page refreshes in 
Internet Explorer is a little strange, and sometimes it forces you to 
manually take it out of forms mode.  I'm less than crazy about that, but I 
can live with it.

I will say categorically, though, that after using Window-Eyes Version 5.5 
and the beta of Version 6.0, that apart from being able to script 
applications, Window-Eyes blows the doors off of JAWS right now.  I don't 
have to refresh the screen hardly ever, and I don't have to sit there and 
play silly games with color settings to get documents that happen to be in 
Courier 10 pt font to read.

If you could tell me what difficulty you've had, maybe I can either 
reproduce it, or it is something that I've seen and dealt with already.

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 10:57 PM 10/30/2006 -0500, you wrote:
>I just wish 1 of the people who doesn't have the problems I have with 7.1
>could give me an idea what we're doing different but so far, I've asked 3
>people about it and 2 jumped down my throat, 1 is a proven liar and trouble
>starter anyway so I don't count him really, another one I guess he knows
>some one at FS or something so they can do no wrong in his eyes, and the
>other person just plain didn't answer the question.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:40 PM
>Subject: Re: Off Topic - Jaws 7.1 Memory requirements
>
>
> > Hi John.
> >
> > I ran into some problems on two machines where a user would be trying to
> > edit a MS Word document and would be just arrowing around the document
> > when
> > the cursor would abruptly move to the top of the document.  I was able to
> > observe this repeatedly on the two machines in question, and they were
> > both
> > running JAWS 7.0.  Upgrading the machines to JAWS 7.10 cured the problem
> > on
> > both machines, and that is primarily what keeps me from being a big fan of
> > 7.0.
> >
> > I think that what makes these comparisons so hard is that different
> > computer users use the machines in different ways, and almost no two
> > people
> > have Windows configured in exactly the same way, and sometimes things
> > affect performance that you would not expect to do so.
> >
> > I for one would feel a lot more comfortable with JAWS if it were less
> > touchy about video, as I tend to think that is really their achilles heel.
> >
> > I'll stick by what I said last night, though.  I like having the
> > capability
> > to script programs.  Window-Eyes' hyperactive windows are handy for some
> > things, but they also impose some limitations that are just not an issue
> > for JAWS.  I don't think in this business it is ever all one or the
> > other--you just have to weigh what is important to you.
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> >
> > At 08:21 AM 10/30/2006 -0500, you wrote:
> >>I think 7.0 is 1 of the best versions made but 6.2 wasn't too bad either.
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 10:49 PM
> >>Subject: Re: Off Topic - Jaws 7.1 Memory requirements
> >>
> >>
> >> > No fooling!  I think I figured that out quite a while ago.  Lots of
> >> > sarcasm
> >> > intended!
> >> >
> >> > I use it at work, and I was unimpressed enough with it there that I
> >> > will
> >> > not spend personal money on it at home.  That is why I am taking a wait
> >> > and
> >> > see posture with it before spending any more money on it.  I've got one
> >> > foot out the door.
> >> >
> >> > 73.
> >> > --Lou K2LKK
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > At 06:54 PM 10/28/2006 -0400, you wrote:
> >> >>That won't work. You must be authorized to run 7.0 and 7.10 and if you
> >> >>didn't keep up your SMA, you aren't authorized if it expired with 6.20.
> >> >>
> >> >>----- Original Message -----
> >> >>From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >>Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 5:52 PM
> >> >>Subject: Re: Off Topic - Jaws 7.1 Memory requirements
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>So, just download it off Freedom Scientific's web site.  They archive
> >> >>all
> >> >>the previous versions up there.  Even if you have a slow internet
> >> >>connection, it only takes a few minutes for a friend with high speed to
> >> >>download it and dump it to a CD-RW.
> >> >>
> >> >>--Lou K2LKK
> >> >
> >> > Louis Kim Kline
> >> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> >> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> >> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> >> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
> >> >
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
> >

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2