that's almost got to be it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matt VanDeWalle" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: question on RAM


> 512 minus 64 for onboard  video maybe?
>
>
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, T Behler wrote:
>
>> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:13:28 -0500
>> From: T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
>> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: question on RAM
>>
>>    John and all:
>>
>> Ok, now I got it.
>>
>> I got my RAM info via "my computer" just like John suggested.  I just had 
>> to
>> re-set my JAWS cursor, and it was fine.
>>
>> Now to the next question:
>>
>> I have 448 MB of RAM in this computer.
>>
>> Is that going to be enough for the new Jaws 8.0, or am I heading for a
>> problem here?
>>
>> I also never heard of 448 MB of RAM;  I thought it usually went in blocks
>> from 128, to 256, and then up to 512.
>>
>> You learn something new every day.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 3:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: question on RAM
>>
>>
>>> that's how I do it, in the system properties, just use the jaws curser, 
>>> it
>>> will read version of windows, and as you go down, who it's registered 
>>> to,
>>> and then the CPU speed followed by the RAM. Processor speed and RAM are 
>>> on
>>> the same line. On mine anyway.
>>>
>>
>