Unfortunately, I guess pot is an ambiguous term.  I was more thinking of 
the porcelain throne than of the recreational use of the term.  Oh, well, 
there's a good portion of the world that could stand to perch on the 
throne, too!  I think we just got back to religion and politics!

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 09:06 PM 7/25/2006 -0600, you wrote:
>hey, if the whole world went to Pot, i think there would be allot more peace
>and good will...
>73
>Colin, V A6BKX
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:56 PM
>Subject: Re: alternative to Jaws....
>
>
> > I suppose if they used real wood in my furniture, it would still be strong
> > enough to hold that tube gear!  Basically, the whole country is going to
> > pot!  Oh, no!  Now I sound like an old fart!
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> >
> >
> > At 04:54 PM 7/25/2006 -0600, you wrote:
> > >Perhaps yo are right from the musicians point of view, but I did have
> > >before I cleaned out my hd a truly scientific  blind study that refutes
> > >that point of view.  Personally I still have a warm spot for the older
> > >technology, however.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >>> [log in to unmask] 7/25/2006 4:06 PM >>>
> > >no no no!!!! the glow in the dark still has much supperior sound
> > >quality no
> > >matter what.
> > >You can not get the same sound quality out of any transistorized
> > >equipment.
> > >You might come close, and certainly the smaller size, lack of
> > >substantial
> > >heat and feature rich components certainly make the non-tube stuff
> > >easier,
> > >cheaper and nicer to be around.
> > >Any musician worth his sault will tell you that tube driven amplifiers
> > >still
> > >are far far supperior to transistorized amps.
> > >The same is true with audio equipment such as stereos and preamps and
> > >so on.
> > >That said, of course, a 1948 am tube radio probably wont sound as good
> > >as
> > >your 15 dollar wallmart special bed side radio, but if you compare a
> > >modern
> > >tube amp, against a modern transistor amp, there is a huge difference.
> > >tubes are warmer, have more head room, are cleaner, and can take much
> > >more
> > >abuse and knocking about then most transistorized components.
> > >73
> > >Colin, V A6BKX
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Brett Winchester" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:49 PM
> > >Subject: Re: alternative to Jaws....
> > >
> > >
> > > > My parents had a Magnavox console radio vintage 1948 or so with an
> > >am
> > > > shortwave plus phonograph with an optional Fm tuner which we did not
> > > > have.  This PA fed a pair of elelectrostatic   speakers and had a lot
> > >of
> > > > volume.  My wife's fisher vintage 1982 with 120 watts per channel
> > >would
> > > > have to work to race the older radio.  Or perhaps I am a bit too
> > > > nostalgic.  I have heard that the "glow in the dark" has a better
> > >sound
> > > > but think that has been more or less proven wrong now.  Ah well warm
> > > > sound nice "real" cabinet work Like homemade ice cream  on a summer
> > > > day.....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >>> [log in to unmask] 7/25/2006 3:29 PM >>>
> > > > if i were to guess, something between 45 and 60W?
> > > > I know a pair of 6l6's in my guitar amp put out around 60W
> > > > 73
> > > > Colin, V A6BKX
> > > >
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
> >

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753