Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:59:46 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't know - I'd think if you're dead stable at 100, not having
swings, you're doing pretty well.
Craig Miles wrote:
> Wolfgang Lutz and Christian Allan in Life Without Bread say it should
> be between 70 and 90 in normal individuals.
> Over 100 is a sign of things not being right.
>
> Regards,
> Craig.
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Trish Leon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Fasting glucose should be between 90 and approx. 140. Right?
>>
>>
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: Robert Kesterson
>> Sender: Paleolithic Eating Support List
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> ReplyTo: Paleolithic Eating Support List
>> Subject: Re: Zero Carb Paleo
>> Sent: Feb 3, 2009 8:08 PM
>>
>> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:23:21 -0600, Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> ... I would add that
>>> a fasting blood glucose level close to 100 is not, in my estimation,
>>> ideal.
>>>
>> Just curious -- what is? (I'm really not sure what I should be aiming for, other than "under 100"?)
>>
>> --
>> Robert Kesterson
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|