Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 29 May 2007 23:22:07 -0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I want to read the article.
][<en
Leland Torrence wrote:
> Esteemed Researcher,
>
> What is “phallic authority?
>
> Signed: Not In My Phalanx.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* The Listserv that makes holes in Manhattan schist for free!
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of
> *[log in to unmask]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 29, 2007 11:36 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* [BP] What our scholars are thinking, part 264, section 12-A.
>
> From an article in Winterthur Portfolio, Spring 200):
>
> //This article discusses a patronage dispute that arose between John
> D. Rockefeller Jr. and sculptor George Grey Barnard during the
> completion of the Adam and Eve Fountain (finished in 1923) on the
> Rockefeller estate in Pocantico Hills, New York. Rockefeller demanded
> under contract that Adam's penis be covered by a cloud, while Barnard,
> through various means, including unapproved work on the statue,
> resisted this stipulation. This confrontation centers on a broadly
> sketched gender analysis of the Rockefeller family's dealings with
> art, on the contentious hierarchical relationships these art dealings
> highlighted, and on the artist, Barnard. The article concludes that
> the penis question was not incidental to Rockefeller Jr.'s position as
> the legal guardian of the fountain contract but symbolically and
> psychologically lay at the very heart of his determination to exercise
> "phallic" authority as the patron.//
>
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|