Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:46:10 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
<000101c76fce$2103ed00$630bc700$@fm> |
Organization: |
some |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:42:29 -0400, Paleo Phil <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:31:50 -0400 William wrote:
>> The short lifespan of paleoman appears to be an article of faith.
>> If there is any evidence in support of it, please post it.
>
> I did, in my post of Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:16:30 -0400, which included
> Lawrence Angel's data.
Not good enough; when Carrie showed ( 25 Mar 2007 14:44:22) that the
"scientists" cannot tell the difference between the bones of the aged and
the bones of the young.
This discussion is puzzling, as lack of disease/aging is the reason why
we eat paleofood.
If you really believe that paleofood cannot improve health/longevity, then
why eat it? You are going to die at 32.
William
|
|
|