PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Date:
Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:13:36 +0000
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Chris Highcock <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<000c01c74267$5b621dd0$6701a8c0@tower>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>
> 	"Each time Barry Groves reports on a medical study he gave a
> different conclusion to the data than the researchers do...." --Dr.  
> Joel
> Fuhrman,
> http://www.diseaseproof.com/archives/diet-myths-the-misinformation- 
> of-barry-
> groves-and-weston-price.html  [I don't agree with many of the  
> opinions at
> Fuhrman's site, but it is interesting that Fuhrman reports  
> additional cases
> of Groves misrepresenting study results.]

I thought that that was the point?  Sometimes Groves may be making  
the point that the data does not necessarily support the conclusions  
that are being drawn from it.  There is a whole separate debate about  
the inherent bias in much of modern peer reviewed science.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2