 
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 |
| Date: |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:15:58 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
Quoted-Printable |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:41:54 -0500, Ashley Moran
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:44 am, Robert Kesterson wrote:
>
>> Weight loss is related to limiting *calories*, regardless of source.
>> Carbs and fats metabolize differently, but in the end, weight loss is
>> dependent on a caloric deficit.
>
> I thought it was fairly well established here that high-fat diets are
> the best method of weight loss, regardless of calorific intake?
My point was that limiting *calories* results in weight loss. Limiting
carbs without restricting calories (ie, by replacing carb calories with
fat calories) is just rearranging deck chairs. (I think a paleo diet that
includes reduced caloric intake is a marvelous way to lose weight, btw.)
--
Robert Kesterson
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
