ECHURCH-USA Archives

The Electronic Church

ECHURCH-USA@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Electronic Church <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:53:29 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I never saw the below reply show up on the list.  Beats me why that happens
once and awhile.

Phil.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: IS " 6 6 6 " JUST A FABLE ? ? ?Let me know what you think??


> I have read tons of such King James Bible deconstruction, thus the twisted
> doctrinal and theological interpretation of Scripture, hundreds of times
> over the years.  I was not convinced then and I am not convinced now.  The
> writers of that article obviously have little knowledge of who the King
> James translators really were but that aside, there translation methods
> likely indicate their agenda which I bet is glaringly obvious elsewhere on
> their website.  I'm getting too old to hunt around for it and attempt to
> rebut it though.  Besides, it may be true that the mark of the beast is up
> for grabs as far as its meaning but the plain interpretation of Scripture
is
> definitely lost to these guys who wrote this article.  I've seen more KJV
> haters in my life than crooked politicians.  It is like Lester Rolloff
used
> to say, "The King James Bible doesn't need to be re written, it needs to
be
> re red."  Amen, Brother.
>
> Phil.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2