Brother Sidibeh,
You are probably right, most of our people cast their votes for parties and
individuals for reasons other than ideas and agendas they have to move the
country forward and improve the plight of our people and that is precisely the
reason why we find ourselves in the same vicious cycle, forever insulating
our politicians from criticism and scrutiny and enabling them to play on the
ignorance of the people, and if they happen to engage in something that puts
their integrity and competence into question, so what?
A policy document is the road map a party lays for how they will do the job
the people elect them to do competently so can we really relegate the
inability to put one together to such insignificance?
You have raised an interesting point because one has to then wonder what is
it that motivates some of our people to vote for any party or individual in
our society that is seemingly ignorant of one of the most important reasons
one should consider in making a decision to vote for a given party or
individual? The reason the people cast their votes for any party or individual should
be clearly outlined objectives for getting the job done and any well meaning
politician or political party whose intentions are in line with what is best
for the people will no doubt know that it is equally their responsibility to
have a clear road map and to educate the people as to it's importance in the
greater scheme of things instead of taking their ignorance as a blessing in
the avoidance of scrutiny. It is time that we strive for higher ideals
instead of insulating and enabling bad character traits in politicians aspirants
and still expecting better results in the long run. It is time we stop
capitalizing on the ignorance of the people.
Jabou Joh
In a message dated 9/6/2006 2:06:33 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Really?
Are we not actually missing the point about what is embarrasing? What
percentage of eligible Gambian voters cast their ballots for any political
party on account of ideas expressed in its policy document????? To whom are
these documents relevant anyway?
It is time, I would like to submit, that those of us wanting to bring about
lasting progressive change in Gambia rethink our methods of mass
mobilisation.
sidibeh
2006/9/6, Alieu Sanyang <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> Oops! This is embarassing to say the least. This is the kind of group who
> wants to come and lead our country?
> Who is Karamba/where is he? Is there anyone here from UDP/NRP who can
> expalin what happened?
> We are all ears.
> Alieu.
>
> [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> Well, if this document was plagiarized as alleged, then aside from it
> being
> a clear indication of the UDP/NRP alliance's lack of a solid agenda for
> the
> development of the country should they come into power, it is also a gross
> embarassment for our country.
>
> Jabou Joh
>
> In a message dated 9/5/2006 2:50:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> Here is the correct link. He missed out on the .pdf extension. It's an
> adobe
>
> doc...
>
> http://www.imf.org/external/np/prsp/2002/gmb/01/043002.pdf
>
>
> Regards
>
> Pa Morro
>
>
> >From: "Yusupha Jow"
> >Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: [>-<] FWD: THE ALLIANCE for REGIME CHANGE POLICY PROPOSALS:
> >Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:25:18 -0700
> >
> >Joe:
> >First, I'd like to point out that at the moment these are only
> allegations.
> >Once we get more information from Musa Sana (such as a working link to
> >relevant IMF page), we should be in a better position to determine if
> this
> >is a case of plagiarism or not.
> >
> >I see no major problems with the UDP/NRP using the IMF/UN documents as
> the
> >basis for their development program IF they give proper credits to their
> >source(s). The practice of citing sources is common in academia. However,
> >the consequences are dire if one does not do this.
> >
> >I think the main issue with what they've been accused of was touched upon
> >by
> >Egu, which is it would show the UDP/NRP may lack a solid or complete
> >agenda as it pertains to plans for the development of The Gambia -- a
> >disturbing development.
> >
> >That being said, I'd take the UDP/NRP alliance any day over the APRC!
> >
> >Thanks!
> >Yusupha
> >
> >On 9/5/06, Joe Sambou wrote:
> >>
> >>[ This e-mail is posted to Gambia|Post e-Gathering by "Joe Sambou" <
> >>[log in to unmask]> ]
> >>
> >>
> >>Folks, we have attacked folks here for plagiarism, yet, we are playing
> >>dead
> >>with this apparent deception. Why are Gambians mute on this issue? Why
> >>would we even attempt to rationalize this criminal act? The UDP/NRP had
> >>years to have a policy document and Gambians have been asking them for
> one
> >>for years and just a few days ago, Chris Sukuna was the latest request.
> >>They shamelessly lifted a document from another and called it their own
> >>and
> >>what do we see, folks trying to provide cover for this apparent
> cheating.
> >>Now, let's say the APRC had done that, we would be all over them. If it
> >>were NADD, this place would be uncontrollable. Why is it different for
> >>the
> >>UDP/NRP? Is this the kind of Gambia were are trying to foster, where we
> >>dwell on hypocrisy?
> >>
> >>Karamba, that doctored this document, should be here to explain his
> >>behavior
> >>to this body. I mentioned him because he forwarded this same document to
> >>the MGAC as the UDP/NRP policy and he claimed he had spent hours
> >>summarizing
> >>it, even, to shorten it for the moderator at the conference to read it
> to
> >>the audience. We called him several times during the conference to
> >>consult
> >>him on the pliagiarism charge regarding the document, but we did not get
> a
> >>response. This is academic dishonesty and laziness folks and we cannot
> >>cover it or excuse it. Hey, smooth talking will not excuse this criminal
> >>act and none is not going to dumb us down. This is a low hanging fruit
> >>and
> >>if we cannot be honest about this one, I wonder what we would be honest
> >>about. If the UDP/NRP with all their claimed brain power have to steal a
> >>document and called it their own, knowing that there is technology that
> >>can
> >>expose them, I say desperation has set in. For one has to be really
> >>desperate to risk this humiliation. They had years to come up with a
> >>document, but alas. Now we understand why they signed the NADD MOU and
> >>later on called it a mistake or what ever. If they can cheat in this
> >>fashion, what else can they cheat on? Folks, this is a travesty,
> >>especially
> >>for a party that wish to lead us.
> >>
> >>Chi Jaama
> >>
> >>Joe
> >>
> >>
> >> >From: "Kejau Touray"
> >> >Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> >> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >> >Subject: RE: [>-<] FWD: THE ALLIANCE for REGIME CHANGE POLICY
> PROPOSALS:
> >> >Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:38:05 +0100
> >> >
> >> >[ This e-mail is posted to Gambia|Post e-Gathering by "Kejau Touray"
> >> > ]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Hello Musa,
> >> >Nowadays everyone does some plagiarism, from Tony Blair ( on weapons
> of
> >> >mass destruction report), and unlike students, nobody can penalise
> them,
> >> >only if breach the laws of copyright can they be sued by the party who
> >> >suffered loss.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Kejau
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>From: "musa sana"
> >> >>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> >> >>To: [log in to unmask]
> >> >>Subject: RE: [>-<] FWD: THE ALLIANCE for REGIME CHANGE POLICY
> >>PROPOSALS:
> >> >>Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 05:07:13 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >>[ This e-mail is posted to Gambia|Post e-Gathering by "musa sana" ]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Folks,
> >> >>
> >> >>This is just to wet your appetites. until i receive shipment of my
> >> >>documents, pls.i refer you all to the below IMF site. It should be
> >>noted
> >> >>that my mission is not to humiliate UDP/NRP. No, it is to point at
> the
> >> >>stupidity of their actions. Also important to note is their
> >>craftmanship
> >> >>in doctoring sub-headings like HUNGER instead of NUTRITION as
> appeared
> >>on
> >> >>the document, CRD, LRD &URD instead of (provinces)or rural areas.
> >> >>
> >> >>More to come as soon as i have time.
> >> >>
> >> >>htt://www.imf.org/external/NP/prsp/2002/gmb/01/043002
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Until then, pls.enjoy.
> >> >>
> >> >>Musa Sanneh
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>From: "musa sana"
> >> >>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> >> >>To: [log in to unmask]
> >> >>Subject: RE: [>-<] FWD: THE ALLIANCE for REGIME CHANGE POLICY
> >>PROPOSALS:
> >> >>Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 23:09:06 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >>[ This e-mail is posted to Gambia|Post e-Gathering by "musa sana" ]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Folks,
> >> >>
> >> >>It appears that UDP/NRP does not know the repercussions for
> plagiarism.
> >> >>Folk, UDP/NRP policy statement is a carbon copy of the Gambia
> >>government's
> >> >>policy statement negotiated with our traditional donors at the donor
> >>round
> >> >>table in Geneva. I have reviewed this document while preparing a
> >>project
> >> >>in economic 301 way ago in 1999.Its unfortunate.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>I will come back with more on this issue.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Musa Sanneh
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>From:United Democratic Party NYC
> >> >>Reply-To:[log in to unmask]
> >> >>To:GAMBIA LIST , gambia post
> >> >>
> >> >>Subject:[>-<] FWD: THE ALLIANCE for REGIME CHANGE POLICY PROPOSALS:
> >> >>Date:Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Ladies and Gentlemen, below isthe policy proposals for the
> UDP/NRP/GPDP
> >> >>ALLIANCE FOR REGIME CHANGE (ARC).
> >> >>
> >> >>Thank you.
> >> >>UDP/NRP/GPDP ALLIANCE for Regime Change
> >> >>New York -USA
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>POLICY PROPOSALS OF THE U/NRP ALLIANCE – APRIL 2006
> >> >>
> >> >>1) POLICY BACKGROUND – COUNTRY SITUATION
> >> >>2) POLICY FRAMEWORK OF THE ALLIANCE
> >> >>3) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY CHALLENGES
> >> >>
> >> >>i) ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INFLATION
> >> >>ii) THE DEBT QUESTION
> >> >>iii) AGRICULTURE
> >> >>iv) TAXATION AND REDUCTION OF EXPENDITURES IN THE SOCIAL
> >> >>SERVICE SECTORS
> >> >>
> >> >>v) INFRASTRUCTURE
> >> >>vi) TOURISM
> >> >>
> >> >>4) SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY CHALLENGES
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>i) THE CHALLENGES OF POVERTY AND HUNGER/INCOME AND
> >> >>HUNGER
> >> >>ii) THE CHALLENGES OF EDUCATION
> >> >>iii) THE CHALLENGES OF HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND HIV/AIDS
> >> >>
> >> >>iv) THE CHALLENGES OF WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT
> >> >>v) THE CHALLENGES OF YOUTH EMPOWERMENT
> >> >>vi) THE CHALLENGES OF SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
> >> >>vii) (a) THE CHALLENGES OF GOVERNANCE
> >> >>
> >> >>AND
> >> >> DEVELOPMENT
> >> >>(b) THE CHALLENGES OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULE
> >> >>
> >> >>1) THE COUNTRY SITUATION – POLICY BACKGROUND
> >> >>
> >> >>The overall policy aim of the UDP/NRP Alliance is to meet the
> >>development
> >> >>challenges confronting The Gambia which the current APRC regime
> >>abysmally
> >> >>failed to handle. The main development challenge is poverty which is
> >> >>increasing instead of declining daily. Eradicating extreme poverty
> and
> >> >>hunger is the first Millennium Development Goal (MDG) and is in many
> >>ways
> >> >>also the most daunting challenge for The Gambia. Poverty as a
> challenge
> >> >>cannot be explained and managed without meeting the challenges of
> >>Economic
> >> >>and political governance. Under the APRC regime the development
> >>situation
> >> >>of The Gambia plunged into the following crisis: increase poverty and
> >> >>hunger,
> >> >>under-utilisation of the productive base of the economy, a weak
> >>resource
> >> >>base, indebtedness, unemployment, slippage in economic and political
> >> >>governance, persistent gender inequality, inadequate provision of
> >>health
> >> >>and education services (particularly for the poor and rural
> residents),
> >> >>and rising HIV/AIDS zero-prevalence rates. The high rate of poverty
> >>also
> >> >>exacerbates environmental degradation and threatens Government
> efforts
> >>to
> >> >>promote sustainable environmental management. This crisis came about
> >> >>through the APRC's Economic and Political mal-governance, bad
> policies
> >>and
> >> >>lack of prudent economic management and financial discipline in
> public
> >> >>expenditure programmes. They also manifest the absence of Human
> >> >>Development focus and Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA) as a
> >>Development
> >> >>Framework.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Since the illegal seizure of power in July 1994, the APRC regime
> >>through
> >> >>the mismanagement of the economy and resources, lack of transparency
> >>and
> >> >>accountability and disrespect for the Rule of Law and
> constitutionality
> >>in
> >> >>the name of a "revolution" or "Soldiers with a difference" created
> the
> >> >>current crisis. The regime's approach to development is characterized
> >>by
> >> >>misplaced priorities, inappropriate policy measures, inadequate
> >> >>implementation mechanisms and lack of political commitment. The
> regime
> >> >>says that it wants to encourage investment yet it introduces
> >>unreasonable
> >> >>tax charges that kill the Goose that lays the golden egg. The regime
> >> >>fails to create a conducive investment environment
> >> >>such as constant supply of power to attract investors, making The
> >>Gambia
> >> >>an investors' paradise of the sub-region. Instead, the regime relies
> on
> >> >>an overburdening bureaucracy resulting in unnecessary delays and time
> >> >>wasting of business transactions. This stifles investor's confidence.
> >> >>The regime says that it wants to improve the economic conditions of
> the
> >> >>Gambian poor without improving their productive potential. Instead,
> the
> >> >>regime relies on debts (foreign and domestic) the servicing of which
> >> >>further impoverishes the Gambian masses. The regime claims to usher
> in
> >>a
> >> >>meaningful development for The Gambia without adequately addressing
> the
> >> >>agricultural sector, the provision of social services such as health
> >>and
> >> >>education. But it instead invest in white elephant projects –
> >> >>the July 22nd Arch, the Kanilai Palace, the jet aircrafts, the
> >> >>multi-million musical mixer set, the six multi-million Dollar
> luxurious
> >> >>American Limousines without addressing the need to purchase the
> farmers
> >> >>harvest of groundnuts, or providing transport facilities for our
> school
> >> >>children or providing adequate drugs for our hospitals and health
> >>centres
> >> >>or rebuilding our main south bank trunk road. The regime says that it
> >> >>wants to provide employment for our youth population, but yet failed
> to
> >> >>build the productive base of the economy in the form of factories and
> >> >>processing industries, which can absorb a
> >> >>significant percentage of the labour force and boost our export
> >> >>potential. The regime claims to be the protector of human and
> peoples'
> >> >>rights but yet the Gambian people are being subject to constant fear
> >> >>through the harassment by the security forces especially the
> notorious
> >> >>National Intelligence Agency. The regime regards itself to be
> >>democratic
> >> >>but yet its political governance record is one of the poorest in the
> >> >>sub-region. The constant tampering with the Constitution by doctoring
> >>it
> >> >>to the taste of the regime, the lack of political commitment to its
> own
> >> >>decentralization programme, the dismissal of elected Mayors and
> >>Chairmen
> >> >>of local authorities, the hiring and firing of elected and
> non-elected
> >> >>officials of the regime just because they appear to be on the other
> >>side
> >> >>of the political divide, illustrate how undemocratic the regime is.
> The
> >> >>question now is:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>- is this the kind of situation we want to continue
> >> >>with after 2006?
> >> >>
> >> >>- Is there an alternative to the present situation?
> >> >>
> >> >>- If so what is the alternative?
> >> >>
> >> >>We certainly do not want the present situation to continue beyond
> 2006.
> >> >>The alternative is the UDP/NRP alliance approach to meet the
> >> >>aforementioned Development challenges.
> >> >>
> >> >>2) THE ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK
> >> >>
> >> >>Recognising the magnitude of the aforementioned development
> challenges,
> >> >>and considering the need to formulate tangible and appropriate
> >>solutions
> >> >>the alliance considers it imperative to first formulate a policy
> >>framework
> >> >>that will facilitate the speedy, efficient and sustainable
> >>implementation
> >> >>of our recommendation. If elected, the policy framework of the
> Alliance
> >> >>is the promotion of Human Development based on Human rights Based
> >>Approach
> >> >>(HRBA). This framework simply means putting people at the centre
> stage
> >>of
> >> >>development. It calls for enlarging peoples' choice and building
> their
> >> >>capabilities to live a long and healthy life, have access to
> knowledge,
> >> >>enjoy a
> >> >>decent standard of living, and participate in the life of their
> >>community
> >> >>and the decisions that affect their lives. Since there are many ways
> of
> >> >>expanding people's choice, the key dimensions of human development
> can
> >> >>evolve over
> >> >>time. However the current central issues our alliance will address
> >> >>include participation and freedom, sustainable human development and
> >>human
> >> >>security against both chronic threats such as hunger and abrupt
> threats
> >> >>such as job loss.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>This framework – Human Development and Human Rights Based Approach –
> is
> >> >>holistic seeking to balance economic efficiency, equity and freedom.
> It
> >> >>is action oriented, recognizing that the link between Economic growth
> >>and
> >> >>human progress requires deliberate policies. It must be acknowledged
> >> >>that growth for its own sake is not enough; its structure and quality
> >> >>matters as well. Human development further defines human poverty as
> the
> >> >>denial of both material wellbeing, and the chance for a life of
> >>dignity,
> >> >>self-respect and basic rights.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>The attractiveness of this policy framework of our alliance lies in
> the
> >> >>fact that it has several indices to quantitatively measure human
> >> >>development. These indices include the Human Development Index (HDI),
> >> >>Human Poverty Index (HPI), the gender related development index (GD1)
> >> >>which adjusts the human development for gender inequality, the gender
> >> >>empowerment index (GEI) which assesses gender equality in economic
> and
> >> >>political participation.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>The specific policy proposals emanating from this framework and which
> >>are
> >> >>highlighted below will help shape our poverty reduction strategy;
> they
> >> >>will help all stakeholders – NGOS, civil society and the private
> sector
> >>-
> >> >>to monitor progress and hold our Government accountable, they will
> help
> >> >>the media and international organizations to steer our development
> >>effort
> >> >>programmes and policies in the right direction. The framework can
> also
> >> >>serve as a basis for evaluating and ensuring the adaptation of
> >>policies,
> >> >>plans and strategies geared towards the achievement of the Millennium
> >> >>Development Goals (MDG):
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>1) Eradication of extreme poverty and hunger
> >> >>
> >> >>2) Achievement of universal primary education
> >> >>
> >> >>3) Promotion of gender equality and empowerment of women
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>4) Reduction of child mortality
> >> >>
> >> >>5) Improvement of maternal health
> >> >>
> >> >>6) Combating HIV/Aids, malaria and other diseases
> >> >>
> >> >>7) Ensuring environmental sustainability
> >> >>
> >> >>8) Developing global partnership for development
> >> >>
> >> >>The alliance policy framework if adopted will make the following
> >> >>difference to the current situation:
> >> >>
> >> >>- Our national policies will be revised to reflect the
> >> >>needs of the poor
> >> >>
> >> >>- Our budget priorities will be shifted
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>- Our laws passed and the Constitution will be amended
> >> >>to reflect the needs of the citizenry
> >> >>
> >> >>- The generated data will be incorporated with the
> >> >>statistical system
> >> >>
> >> >>- There will be increased donor funding targeting
> >> >>human development priorities.
> >> >>
> >> >>- There will be prominent media coverage on human
> >> >>development issues
> >> >>
> >> >>- People centred strategies will be adopted and
> >> >>implemented
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>- Civil societies will become vibrant and become
> >> >>active partners.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>3) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY CHALLENGES
> >> >>
> >> >>Given the existing situation in The Gambia, the UDP/NRP Alliance not
> >>only
> >> >>analyses the general development challenges facing the country but
> also
> >> >>proposed policy proposals as alternatives to the bad policies of the
> >>APRC
> >> >>regime. The general development policy challenges we face emanate
> from
> >> >>critical analysis of issues including economic growth, inflation, and
> >>the
> >> >>debt question, agriculture, taxation, infrastructure and suggest
> >> >>alternative approaches to meet these general development policy
> >> >>challenges. In the following Section (4) specific development policy
> >> >>challenges including poverty and hunger, education, health care,
> women
> >> >>empowerment, youth empowerment,
> >> >>sustainable environmental management and governance and development
> are
> >> >>analysed and policy proposals suggested as alternative to the current
> >> >>situation.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>The current national Development strategy is based on the second
> >>strategy
> >> >>for Poverty Alleviation or SPA II. This is The Gambia's first PRSP
> and
> >> >>runs for a Three Year cycle (2003 – 2005) that is scheduled to end in
> >> >>December 2009. SPA II consist of five pillars (i.e Development
> >>objective)
> >> >>which are:-
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>- Improving the enabling policy environment to promote
> >> >>growth and poverty reduction
> >> >>
> >> >>- Enhancing the productive capacity and social
> >> >>protection of the poor and vulnerable
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>- Improving the coverage of the unmet basic needs of
> >> >>the poor
> >> >>
> >> >>- Building capacity for local, people centred
> >> >>development through decentralization
> >> >>
> >> >>- Mainstreaming gender equity, environmental issues,
> >> >>nutrition, and governance and HIV/Aids awareness into all development
> >> >>programs.
> >> >>
> >> >>At a round table conference for The Gambia in September 2002, funds
> to
> >>the
> >> >>tune of USA$118 was pledged. However full disbursement of the amount
> >>was
> >> >>conditional on the Government meeting a variety of specific policy
> >>actions
> >> >>or "triggers". These triggers include action on budgeting processes,
> >> >>greater transparency and accountability in financial matters,
> >>development
> >> >>of strategies and indicators on rural development issues and measures
> >>to
> >> >>ensure a more supportive policy and institutional environment to
>
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.
>
> ��������������������������������������������������
��������
> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
> Web interface
> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]
> ��������������������������������������������������
��������
>
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
|
