BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ham Steve <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:57:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Butch, he's in the UK, not sure about how the Department of Communications 
handles type acceptance there.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: icom radios


> Well, if you're not using them on ham channels, they're not legal
> anyhow.  Not thype excepted.  Too bad.  Try again, and read up on fcc
> regs.
> 73s
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, goshawk wrote:
>
>> as I am not planning on using them on ham channels, you do not need my 
>> call.
>> I am interested.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:25 AM
>> Subject: icom radios
>>
>>
>>> Simon, I can get two models of the i-com radios you are looking for.
>>> Please send me your call with varification information.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/449 - Release Date: 
>>> 9/15/2006
>>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2