BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:01:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Don,

I agree, but I have one additional comment.  I think we waste more 
time and bandwidth commenting about the pros and cons of off-topic 
messages than we do on the topics themselves.

Steve

On Saturday 9/16/06 19:41 don bishop wrote:
>Well, I might as well put my 2 cents worth in here.
>
>Personally, I'd rather stick to topics related to radio in general 
>and ham radio in particular, but it's a great list with incredible 
>amounts of information available.  My
>vote would be for radio related topics, but if the majority want to 
>keep it wide-ranging and if the moderator doesn't care, I'll go with 
>the majority.  It's definitely
>worth it.
>
>Don  W6SMB

ATOM RSS1 RSS2